Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8641 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 19.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.3584 of 2016
and
C.M.P.No.18288 of 2016
Poonkodi ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Andal
2.Pushparaj ...Respondents
Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India to allow this Civil Revision Petition against the order dated
23.06.2016 passed in I.A.No.17 of 2015 in A.S.No.40 of 2014 on the file of
the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gururaj.
For Respondents :
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition arises against an order dated 23.06.2016
passed in I.A.No.17 of 2015 in A.S.No.40 of 2014 on the file of the II
Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, whereby the cause title given in
A.S.No.40 of 2014 with respect to the name of the parties before the Trial
Court was corrected. There is no dispute that A.S.No.40 of 2014 was
preferred against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.336 of 2009 dated
28.03.2014.
2. It transpires that during the typing of the decree, the cause title of
another case has been incorporated and therefore, an application was filed
under Section 152 to correct the cause title. Similarly the operative portion
also was missing and hence that has been brought on line with the
judgment. On the face of it, is a typographical error which is capable of
correction under Section 152.
3.Mr.R.Gururaj, learned counsel for the petitioner brings to my notice
that as against the decree in A.S.No.40 of 2014, a regular Second Appeal
has been preferred in S.A.No.82/2015 and that is pending consideration
before the court. The appeal seems to have been filed against allowing of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the first appeal and decreeing the suit.
4.Insofar as this CRP is concerned, having come to the conclusion
that there is only a typographical error, I do not find any error in the order of
the court below. The CRP consequentially is dismissed. The petitioner is
always entitled to agitate on the correctness or otherwise of the judgmet on
the decree dated 27.10.2014 in A.S.No.40 of 2014 in S.A.No.82 of 2015.
5.With the above observations this Civil Revision Petition stands
dismissed. No Costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
19.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No
nst
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J,
nst
To:
The
2nd Additional Sub Judge,
Cuddalore.
C.R.P.No.3584 of 2016
and
C.M.P.No.18288 of 2016
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
19.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!