Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Lalitha vs K.Mohanlal
2023 Latest Caselaw 8392 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8392 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023

Madras High Court
K.Lalitha vs K.Mohanlal on 17 July, 2023
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 Dated: 17.07.2023

                                                 CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

                                             C.M.A.No.1360 of 2023
                                            and C.M.A.No.153 of 2022
                                            and C.M.P.No.1144 of 2022


                C.M.A.No.1360 of 2023
                1.K.Lalitha
                2.K.Murugan
                3.B.Rajeswari
                4.S.Sathya
                5.M.Devi                                                    ...Appellants
                                                        Vs.
                1.K.Mohanlal


                2.Bharti Axa Gen. Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                   No.8, Walltax Road,
                   Harrington Plaza 1st Floor,
                   Park Town, Chennai - 600 003.                            ...Respondents


                PRAYER : The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
                Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 09.04.2018 in
                M.C.O.P.No.4711 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                Chennai (in the III Court of Small Causes).



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                1/8
                                  For Appellants   : Mr.Terry Chella Raja
                                                    for Mr.M.Pachiyappan


                                  For Respondents : M/s.K.Poomalai for R2
                                                    No appearance for R1
                C.M.A.No.153 of 2022
                Bharati Axa Gen.Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                2nd Floor, Metro Plaza,
                No.162, Annasalai,
                Chennai - 600 002.                                           ... Appellant


                                                         Vs


                1.K.Lalitha
                2.K.Murugan
                3.B.Rajeswari
                4.S.Sathya
                5.M.Devi
                6.K.Mohanlal                                                ... Respondents


                PRAYER : The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
                Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 09.04.2018 in
                M.C.O.P.No.4711 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                Chennai (in the III Court of Small Causes).


                                  For Appellant    : M/s.K.Poomalai


                                  For Respondents : Mr.Terry Chella Raja
                                                    for Mr.M.Pachiyappan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                2/8
                                               JUDGMENT
                          The above appeals have been filed by the Insurance Company as well as

                by the claimants aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the

                Tribunal.



                           2. The claimants filed the Claim Petition in M.C.O.P.No.4711 of 2013 on

                the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai (in the III Court of Small

                Causes). They filed the said claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as

                compensation for the death of one K.Arumugam, who died in the accident that

                took place on 13.03.2013.



                           3. According to the claimants, on the date of accident i.e., on 13.03.2013

                at about 2.30 p.m., while the deceased was crossing the L.B road opposite to

                Jayanthi Theatre, Thiruvanmiyur from East to West direction, a motorcycle

                bearing Registration No.TN-02-AE-5112 ridden by its rider in a rash and

                negligent manner without observing the traffic rules, dashed against the

                deceased; due to the said impact, the deceased suferred injuries and succumbed

                to it; that the deceased, who was aged 58 years, was working as a stone cutter;

                and that he was a sole bread winner of his family and hence, the Insurance

                Company is liable to pay Rs.10 lakhs as compensation.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                3/8
                          4. The rider of two wheeler, who is the owner of the motocycle, remained

                ex-parte before the Tribunal.


                          5.The Insurance Company filed counter statement, denying the averments

                made in the claim petition and stated that the rider of the two wheeler did not

                possess any valid license and hence, the Insurance Company was not liable to

                pay the compensation. In any event, the compensation claimed by the claimants

                is excessive and prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.


                          6. Before the Tribunal, the claimants examined two witnesses as P.W.1

                and P.W.2 and marked 9 documents as Exs.P1 to P9. The Insurance Company

                R.W.1 was examined and marked two documets as Exs.R1 and R2 on their side.


                          7.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

                evidence, held that the deceased died only due to rash and negligent act of the

                rider of the two wheeler and directed the Insurance Company being the insurer

                of the offending vehicle to pay a sum of Rs.11,69,200/- as compensation to the

                claimants.



                          8. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company submitted that the

                accident was of the year 2013 and the notional income of Rs.12,000/- fixed by

                the Tribunal in the absence of any evidence to prove the income is excessive.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                4/8
                          9. Per contra, the learned counsel for the claimants submitted that the

                notional income fixed at Rs.12,000/- is meagre and the Tribunal ought to have

                taken into consideration the fact that the deceased was earning Rs.500/- per day

                and the Tribunal ought to have taken Rs.15,000/- as notional income.



                          10.The first respondent remained ex-parte before the Tribunal. The

                learned counsel for the appellants has made an endorsement to dispense with

                the notice to him.



                           11. Heard the learned counsel appearing for their respective parties and

                perused the materials/ documents available on record before this Court.



                           12.This Court finds that the Tribunal had fixed the notional income at

                Rs.12,000/- which is just and reasonable. The accident had taken place in the

                year 2013 and considering the fact that the wages of even daily wage labourers

                was around Rs.500/- per day at that time the notional income fixed by the

                Tribunal is reasonable.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                5/8
                           13. It is further seen that the Insurance Company has established the fact

                through R.W.1 that the rider of the two wheeler did not have a valid licence.

                The Tribunal found that the Insurance Company is liable to pay and recover the

                same from the rider of the two wheeler.



                           14. Neither the learned counsel appearing for the claimants nor the

                learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company could find fault with the

                compensation awarded by the Tribunal under other heads. Hence, the award of

                the Tribunal is confirmed. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

                compensation amount within a period of six weeks. On such deposit the

                claimants shall withdraw the amount as per the apportionment fixed by the

                Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                                         17.07.2023

                Index: Yes/No
                Internet: Yes/No
                Speaking order: Yes/ No

                gba




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                6/8
                To

                1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
                  (in the III Court of Small Causes),
                  Chennai.

                2.The Section Officer
                  VR Section
                  High Court of Madras, Chennai – 600 104




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




                7/8
                                      SUNDER MOHAN,J.

gba

C.M.A.No.1360 of 2023 and C.M.A.No.153 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.1144 of 2022

17.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter