Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Mani
2023 Latest Caselaw 8284 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8284 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2023

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Mani on 14 July, 2023
                                                                         C.M.A.No.421 of 2022



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 Dated: 14.07.2023

                                                 CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

                                               C.M.A.No.421 of 2022
                                             and C.M.P.No.2935 of 2022
               The Managing Director,
               The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Ltd)
               Ramakrishna Road, Salem,
               Regional Office at Dharmapuri.                              ...Appellant


                                                        Vs.
               1.Mani
               2.Karpagam
               3.Madhu
               4.Poongavanam                                               ...Respondents


               PRAYER : The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
               Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 12.02.2021 in
               M.C.O.P.No.166 of 2020 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
               Special District Judge, Krishnagiri.


                                       For Appellant   : Mr.D.Nithin
                                       For Respondents : No appearance




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
               1/7
                                                                            C.M.A.No.421 of 2022



                                                  JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the

appellant/Transport Corporation challenging the award dated 12.02.2021 in

M.C.O.P.No.166 of 2020 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Special District Judge, Krishnagiri.

2.The respondents herein filed the claim petition claiming a sum of

Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation for the death of one Jadaya Gounder, who died

in the accident that took place on 14.09.2011. According to the respondents, on

the date of accident i.e., on 26.12.2017 at 5.15 a.m., while the deceased was

walking in the extreme left side mud portion of Kaveripattinam to Dharmapuri

N.H.Road. a bus bearing registration No.TN 29 N 2255 belonging to the

appellant came from the opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and

dashed against the deceased. In the accident, the deceased sustained fatal

injuries and died on the spot. Hence, they were entitled to a claim of

Rs.10,00,000/-.

3.The appellant/Transport Corporation filed a counter statement denying

the averments made by the respondents and contended that the driver of the bus

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.421 of 2022

was not responsible for the accident. The accident occurred due to negligence

of the deceased and hence, the deceased is solely responsible for the accident.

Therefore, the appellant was not liable to pay any compensation to the

respondents. The appellant had also denied the age, avocation and income of

the deceased and stated that in any event, the compensation claimed by the

respondents is excessive and prayed for dismissal of the claim petition.

4.Before the Tribunal, the respondents examined two witnesses as P.W.1

and P.W.2 and marked five documents as Exs.P1 to P5. The appellant/Transport

Corporation did not let in any oral or documentary evidence.

5.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary

evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by

the driver of the bus belonging to the appellant/Transport Corporation and

directed the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.5,48,000/- as compensation to the

respondents.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.421 of 2022

6.Against the said award dated 12.02.2021 in M.C.O.P.No.166 of 2020

granting compensation to the respondents, the appellant/Transport Corporation

has come out with the present appeal.

7.The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal is filed

only against the quantum awarded by the Tribunal and there is no dispute with

regard to the negligence. As regards quantum, the learned counsel submitted

that the claim petition has been filed by four persons and the fourth petitioner is

the grandson of the deceased and he cannot be considered as dependent of the

deceased. The Tribunal ought not to have deducted 1/3rd instead of 1/4th towards

personal expenses. The learned counsel was unable to assail the award of

compensation under other heads.

8.Though notice has been served on the respondents, none have entered

appearance on behalf of the respondents.

9.This Court on perusal of the records and on hearing the submissions

made by the learned counsel finds that the Tribunal has deducted 1/4th towards

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.421 of 2022

personal expenses of the deceased treating all the four respondents as

dependents of the deceased. According to the learned counsel for the appellant,

the grandson namely the fourth respondent cannot be treated as dependent of

the deceased. The Tribunal found that the mother of the fourth respondent

/daughter of the deceased was no more and the fourth respondent was living

along with the deceased. The Tribunal has come to the said conclusion from the

evidence of P.W.1. The appellant has not let in any contra evidence to

disbelieve the evidence of P.W.1. Hence this Court is of the view that the

finding of the Tribunal holding the fourth respondent as a dependent of the

deceased cannot be faulted. In such circumstances, since there are four

dependents to the deceased, the deduction of 1/4th towards personal expenses is

in order. Therefore, this Court finds that the award passed by the Tribunal is

just and reasonable and there is no reason to interfere with the award passed by

the Tribunal.

10. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and the

sum of Rs.5,48,000/- awarded by the Tribunal as compensation to the

respondents along with interest and costs is confirmed. The appellant/

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.421 of 2022

Transport Corporation is directed to deposit the entire award amount along with

interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of

twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such

deposit, the respondents are permitted to withdraw their respective share of the

award amount, on the basis of apportionment fixed by the Tribunal, along with

proportionate interest and costs, less the amount if any, already withdrawn.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

14.07.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No vkr

To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge, Krishnagiri.

2.The Section Officer VR Section, High Court of Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.421 of 2022

SUNDER MOHAN,J.

vkr

C.M.A.No.421 of 2022

14.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter