Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9650 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
S.A.No.925 of 2004 & S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S.A.No.925 of 2004 & S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
1.Lingaveni
2.Sivapandi ...Appellants in S.A.No.925 of 2004
1.Lingapushpam
2.Kartheesan
3.Prabhu
4.Jothi
5.Sundari ...Appellants in S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
vs.
Krishna Konar ... Respondent in both appeals
Prayer in S.A.No.925 of 2004: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of
the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated
10.02.2003 in A.S.No.58 of 2000 on the file of the Principal District
Judge, Tuticorin confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 04.01.2000
in O.S.No.10 of 1998 on the file of the Additional District Munsif,
Tiruchendur.
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.925 of 2004 & S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
Prayer in S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005: Second Appeal filed under Section
100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree
dated 08.04.2003 in A.S.No.33 of 2002 on the file of the Subordinate
Judge, Tuticorin confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 08.01.2002
in O.S.No.82 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Munsif,
Tiruchendur.
In both appeals,
For Appellants : Mr.M.P.Senthil
for Mr.J.Antony Jesus
For Respondent : No appearance
COMMON JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants in both appeals
submitted that the sole respondent in both appeals passed away long
before. Court Notice sent to the sole respondent also returned with an
endorsement 'deceased'.
2. Though the sole respondent in both appeals died long before, till
date, no steps have been taken by the learned counsel for the appellants
Page 2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.925 of 2004 & S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole
respondent in both appeals. In view of the fact that the sole respondent
in both appeals died long before, these appeals cannot survive and they
get abated automatically. Therefore, the Second Appeals are dismissed
as abated. No costs.
03.08.2023
NCC:Yes/No
Index:Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
mbi
To
1.The Principal District Judge, Tuticorin
2.The Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur.
3.The Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin
4.The Section Officer,
Vernacular Records Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
Page 3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.925 of 2004 & S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
mbi
S.A.No.925 of 2004 & S.A.(MD)No.226 of 2005
03.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!