Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9626 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
P.Kathirvel .. Petitioner
Versus
1. M/s. Chola Spinning Mills Private Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director S.Venkatachalam
2. The Superintendent of Police,
Coimbatore District. .. Respondents
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, to direct the sentences passed by the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Komarapalayam, Namakkal District in S.T.C.No.121 of 2020,
S.T.C.No.123 of 2020, S.T.C.No.124 of 2020, S.T.C.No.131 of 2020,
S.T.C.No.159 of 2020, S.T.C.No.163 of 2020, S.T.C.No.169 of 2020,
S.T.C.No.172 of 2020, S.T.C.No.173 of 2020, S.T.C.No.174 of 2020,
S.T.C.No.201 of 2020 and S.T.C.No.610 of 2020 all are dated 18.05.2023 to
run concurrently against the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Mohan
For Respondents : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy,
for R1
: Mr.A.Damodaran,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
Additional Public Prosecutor
for R2
ORDER
This petition has been filed to direct the sentences imposed against
the petitioner in thirteen cases to run concurrently in line with Section 427
of Cr.P.C.
2. It is seen that the judgment of conviction and sentence was passed
in all the thirteen cases on 18.05.2023 and the petitioner has not chosen to
file any appeal till date. It is quite surprising that the petitioner has not been
secured and he is not even undergoing the sentence till date. In the
meantime, this petition has been moved to direct all the sentences to run
concurrently in the thirteen cases where the petitioner has been convicted.
3. The learned Counsel for the first respondent / complainant
submitted that the complainant has already taken steps to file an appeal on
the ground that a lesser sentence has been imposed by the Court below and
no compensation has been ordered.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
4. The issue with regard to the sentences running concurrently can be
considered only if a person is already undergoing sentence and the sentence
that has been imposed in the other cases also merges with the sentence that
is undergone by the accused person. In the present case, the petitioner has
not even surrendered and is not undergoing any imprisonment. In view of
the same, there is no scope for this Court to direct the sentences to run
concurrently at this stage. This is more so due to the fact that the first
respondent has already taken steps to file appeals on the ground that a lesser
has been imposed against the petitioner.
5. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition stands
dismissed for the present.
03.08.2023
Index : yes/no
Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no grs
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Komarapalayam, Namakkal District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
2. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
grs
Crl.O.P.No.15411 of 2023
03.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!