Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11238 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2023
ARB.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
and A.No.3328 of 2023
T.K. Usman Sarjun ... Petitioner
Vs.
Emperor Entertainment,
Rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.Irfan Malik,
26, Mahalakshmi Flats,
4A, 3rd Floor, Tank Bund Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent
Prayer : Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) filed
under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
praying to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the
parties herein with respect of the Director Agreement dated 11.11.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.N. Vishvanth
For Respondent : No appearance – Set exparte
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/6
ARB.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator by this
Court.
2. The petitioner was appointed as a Director for the feature film
by name “Blood Money” by the respondent under a Director Agreement
dated 11.11.2020. The petitioner claims that only a part of his
remuneration was paid by the respondent as per the Director Agreement
dated 11.11.2020. According to the petitioner, a sum of Rs.23,16,000/-
is still due and payable by the respondent to the petitioner as per the
Director Agreement dated 11.11.2020 entered into between the
petitioner and the respondent. There is an arbitration clause available in
the Director Agreement dated 11.11.2020, which is extracted
hereunder:-
“19.2 Any dispute/s and/or difference/s between the parties shall at first attempted to be resolved by mutual discussions between the parties hereto, failing which, such dispute/difference will be referred to arbitration
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ARB.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
in accordance to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as amended from time to time, presided over by a sole arbitrator to be appointed by the Madras High Court on an application moved by any one of the parties to this Agreement. Judgment upon the arbitral award may be entered in any competent court at Chennai having jurisdiction over the Parties or their assets. The arbitration proceedings shall be held at Chennai. The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in the English language. The parties shall bear the costs of arbitration equally. The award passed by the sole arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties.”
3. The petitioner has also invoked arbitration in accordance with
the arbitration clause by issuing a notice to the respondent on
10.01.2023. The arbitration invocation notice dated 10.01.2023 has
been returned with an endorsement 'No such person' as seen from the
returned cover which has been filed as a document in the typed set of
documents filed by the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner has also
sent an email to the respondent on 17.01.2023. The petitioner has also
filed his bank statements in the typed set of documents reflecting part
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ARB.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
payment made by the respondent under the Director Agreement dated
11.11.2020. There seems to be a dispute between the parties arising out
of the Director Agreement dated 11.11.2020. Since there is a valid
arbitration clause available in the Director Agreement dated 11.11.2020
and the petitioner has also invoked arbitration in accordance with the
arbitration clause by sending a notice to the respondent on 10.01.2023,
there being no consensus between the parties with regard to the name of
the Arbitrator, this Court has to necessarily appoint an Arbitrator as per
the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996.
4. The respondent has been duly served through substituted
service. Despite effecting substituted service on the respondent, the
respondent has failed to enter appearance in this petition. Earlier, the
notices sent to the respondent in this petition was returned 'unserved'
and only for the said reason, this Court had ordered substituted service
on the respondent. Since there is no representation on behalf of the
respondent till date, the respondent is set exparte by this Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ARB.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court appoints Mr.Vishnu
Mohan, Advocate, as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute
between the petitioner and the respondent arising out of the Director
Agreement dated 11.11.2020. Accordingly, this Arbitration Original
Petition is allowed as prayed for, by issuing the following directions:-
(a) This Court appoints Mr.Vishnu Mohan,
Advocate, having office at No.8, 8th Street,
Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600004,
as the Sole Arbitrator, to adjudicate the dispute
between the parties arising out of the Director
Agreement dated 11.11.2020.
(b) The Arbitrator shall be paid his
remuneration/fees in accordance with the IV Schedule
of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
(c) Both the parties shall equally share the
Arbitrator's fees.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ARB.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Sni
(d) The Arbitrator shall conduct the arbitration
in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall complete the
arbitration within the specified time as prescribed
under the said Act.
Connected application is closed.
25.08.2023 Index: Yes/ No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No
Sni
Arb.O.P.(Com.Div) No.171 of 2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!