Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10999 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2023
S.A. No. 414 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A. No.414 of 2011
and
M.P.No. 1 of 2015
C.Narayanappa (died)
2 Chinnamma
W/o.late Sikkonappa
3 Gopal
S/o.late Narayanappa
4 Nagamma
D/o.late Narayanappa
5 Chithammal
W/o.late Narayanappa
(A3 to A5 are brought on record as LRs of
deceased A1 viz., Narayanappa vide court
order dated 08.06.2023 made in C.M.P.
No. 8264 of 2022 in S.A.No.414 of 2011) .. Appellants
Versus
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A. No. 414 of 2011
1 M.Aanjappa @ Aanji
S/o.Muniyappa
2 Savithri Amma,
W/o.Peerappa
3 Rajamma,
W/o.Govindappa
4 Srinivas
S/o.late M.Muniyappa
5 Sarojamma
W/o.Narayanappa
6 Munilakshmi
D/o.Krishnappa
7 Santhi
W/o.late Krishnappa .. Respondentss
Prayer:- Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against
the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2010 made in A.S.No.24 of 2009 on
the file of Court of Subordinate Judge, Hosur confirming the judgment and
decree dated 10.06.2009 made in O.S.No.103 of 2000 on the file of the
Court of District Munsif, Hosur.
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A. No. 414 of 2011
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondents : R1 to R3 – No appearance
Mr.D.Rajagopal for R4 and R5
Ms.T.Sreelekha for R6 and R7
JUDGEMENT
The appellants 1 and 2 herein are the original plaintiffs and the
appellants 3 to 5 are legal heirs of deceased original 1 st plaintiff
C.Narayanappa. Challenging the findings rendered by the first appellate
judge in A.S.No. 24 of 2009 arisen out of the decree passed in O.S.No.103
of 2000, on the file of Sub-Court, Hosur. The respondents herein are the
defendants in the suit.
2. Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
appearing for the respondents 4 to 7 appeared. It is brought to the notice of
this court that the 2nd appellant died and the learned counsel on record
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No. 414 of 2011
appearing for appellants Mr.M.V.Krishnan also passed away. Hence, this
court ordered notice on 02.08.2023 to the appellants through court and the
same were served on the appellants 3 to 5 on 04.08.2023.
3. Considering the fact that though notices served on the appellants 3
to 5 and their names were printed in the cause list, there is representation on
the side of appellants today, the Second Appeal is liable to be dismissed as
abated. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition stands closed.
22.08.2023 rpp
To
Sub-Judge, Hosur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No. 414 of 2011
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
S.A. No. 414 of 2011
22.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!