Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Kulanthai Theresa vs The District Registrar
2022 Latest Caselaw 17681 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17681 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2022

Madras High Court
D.Kulanthai Theresa vs The District Registrar on 17 November, 2022
                                                                         W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 17.11.2022

                                                       CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                              W.P.(MD)No.2586 of 2016

                     D.Kulanthai Theresa                                   ... Petitioner
                                                        -vs-

                     1. The District Registrar,
                        Ramanathapuram,
                        Ramanathapuram District.

                     2. The Sub Registrar,
                        Office of the Sub Registrar,
                        Velipattanam,
                        Ramanathapuram,
                        Ramanathapuram District.

                     3. The Assistant Commissioner,
                        Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
                        Paramakudi,
                        Ramanathapuram District.                        .... Respondents


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the
                     records of the second respondent herein in his proceedings in Memorandum
                     No.2/2013, dated 03.07.2013 and quash the same and direct the second
                     respondent to register the Document in respect of the land situated in


                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016


                     Survey No.440 and Plot No.18, measuring 5 cents in Pattanamkathan
                     Village, Ramnad District as an when the documents presented for
                     registration by the petitioner.


                                       For Petitioner    : Mr.G.Chandrasekar

                                       For R-1 & R-2     : Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran
                                                           Additional Government Pleader
                                       For R-3           : Mr.P.Subbaraj
                                                           Special Government Pleader


                                                          ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging a Memo issued

by the second respondent herein, refusing to entertain a Sale Deed presented

for registration, on the ground that the land belongs to Subramania Swamy

Temple, Melayakudi Village, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

2. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, he is the

absolute owner of the property and there are no documents in favour of the

Temple. However, based upon a letter addressed by the Inspector General of

Registration, dated 18.02.2009, the second respondent has refused to

entertain the Document. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016

3. Per contra, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for

the third respondent had relied upon a registered Will in Document No.2 of

1925, dated 08.09.1924, under which, he claims that the property has been

endowed in favour of the Temple. He further relied upon the Temple records

to indicate that Survey Number in dispute is a Temple property. However,

according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, these documents do not

reflect that the land belongs to the Temple or some erroneous self serving

entries have been made by the third respondent or Temple concerned.

4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this

Court the Judgment of the Honourable Division Bench in (Sudha Ravi

Kumar Vs. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Hindu

Religious and Charitable Endowments Department) reported in (2017) 3

CTC Page 135. The Honourable Division Bench of this Court has laid down

the procedure to be followed by the registering authorities whenever an

objection is raised by the Temple relating to the registration of a document.

If an objection is raised as contemplated under Section 22-A of Registration

Act, the Sub Registrar has been directed to conduct a summary enquiry after

giving due opportunity to both the parties. Paragraph No.26 of the said

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016

judgment of this Court, is extracted as follows:-

26. In view of the above discussions, all the Writ Petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside with the following directions:

(i) The registering authority before whom the document has been presented shall cause service of notice on the parties to the deeds and also to the objector/religious institution, hold summary enquiry, hear the parties and then either register or refuse to register the document by passing an order having regard to the relevant facts as indicated above.

(ii) If the registering authority, refuses to register any document by accepting the objections raised under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, the aggrieved may file a statutory appeal under the Act.

(iii) If the objections raised under Section 22-A of the Act by the religious institution are rejected and the document is registered, the remedy for the religious institution is to either approach this Court by way of a Writ Petition seeking cancellation of the registration or for any other relief or to approach the civil Court for declaration of the title and for other consequential reliefs.

(iv) if the registering authority refuses to register the document acting on the objections raised by a religious institution under section 22-A of the Registration Act, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016

parties to the deed will be at liberty to straightway approach the civil Court for declaration of title and other relief without availing the opportunity for filing a statutory appeal.

5. In view of the above said judgment of the Honourable Division

Bench of this Court, in the present case, neither the petitioner nor the third

respondent Temple has been called for a summary enquiry and the written

Memo has been issued by the second respondent herein. Accordingly, the

written Memo impugned in the Writ Petition is set aside and the matter is

remitted back to the file of the second respondent herein. The second

respondent shall adhere to the judgment of the Honourable Division Bench

of this Court as cited supra and the aggrieved party is directed to follow the

procedure laid down in the said judgment.

6. With the above said observation, this Writ Petition stands allowed.

There shall be no order as to costs.



                                                                                              17.11.2022
                     Index    : Yes / No                                                         4/12
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ebsi



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                       W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016




                     To

                     1. The District Registrar,
                        Ramanathapuram,
                        Ramanathapuram District.

                     2. The Sub Registrar,
                        Office of the Sub Registrar,
                        Velipattanam,
                        Ramanathapuram,
                        Ramanathapuram District.

                     3. The Assistant Commissioner,

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD).No.2586 of 2016

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

ebsi

W.P.(MD)No.2586 of 2016

17.11.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter