Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balamurugan vs The State Rep. By
2022 Latest Caselaw 17189 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17189 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2022

Madras High Court
Balamurugan vs The State Rep. By on 2 November, 2022
                                                                Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 02.11.2022

                                                        CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                      CRL.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

                                                         and

                                  CRL.M.P.(MD)Nos.4829, 4830, 4845 & 4846 of 2018


                     Balamurugan                            ... Petitioner in both Crl.O.Ps.


                                                          Vs.

                     1.The State rep. by
                        The Inspector of Police,
                        Pasuvanthanai Police Station,
                        Tuticorin District.
                        (In Crime No.90 of 2008)


                     2.Sudalaimani                          ... Respondents in both Crl.O.Ps.


                     COMMON PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section

                     482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the charge sheet in


                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                               Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

                     C.C.Nos.44 of 2016 and 43 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate

                     No.II, Kovilpatti and quash the same as against the petitioner as illegal.



                     (amended as per order of this Court dated 29.11.2018 in Crl.M.P.
                     (MD)Nos.9831 & 9832 of 2018 in Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of
                     2018)


                                  For Petitioner      : Mr.A.S.Vaigunth
                                  For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar, - for R1
                                                       Government Advocate (Crl. side)
                                                      : died - R2
                                                      (in both Crl.O.Ps.)


                                               COMMON ORDER


                                  These petitions have been filed challenging the proceedings

                     in C.C.Nos.44 and 43 of 2016, pending on the file of the Judicial

                     Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatti, respectively.



                                  2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all

                     factual in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court

                     cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482

                     2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                              Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

                     of Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all

                     the grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on

                     its own merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to

                     interfere with the proceedings pending before the Court below.



                                  3.   The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this

                     Court to dispense with the presence of the petitioner. Taking into

                     consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the

                     petitioner is dispensed with and he shall be represented by a counsel,

                     who shall cross examine the witnesses on the same day or on the next

                     hearing date, after they are examined in Chief. The petitioner shall not

                     dispute the identity of the witnesses. The petitioner shall be present

                     before the Court below as and when directed by the Court below and

                     shall be present at the time of questioning under Section 313(1)(b) Cr.P.C

                     and at the time of passing of the final judgment.



                                  4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), on

                     instructions, submitted that the case was pending before the Judicial

                     Magistrate Court No.II, Kovilpatti, and after formation of a separate


                     3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                              Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

                     Court at Ottapidaram, the case files have been transferred to the file of

                     the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ottapidaram.



                                    5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed

                     of with a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC

                     Nos.44 and 43 of 2016 within a period of four months from the date of

                     receipt of a copy of this order. The trial shall be conducted on a day to

                     day basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme

                     Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl)

                     288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the

                     trial Court to insist upon the presence of the petitioner and remand

                     him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

                     STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH SINGH (JT

                     2001 (4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

                     also closed.




                                                                         02.11.2022
                     Index: Yes/No
                     Internet: Yes/No
                     rm

                     4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                               Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018




                     To


                     1.The Judicial Magistrate Court,
                        Ottapidaram.


                     2. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II,
                        Kovilpatti.


                     3.The Inspector of Police,
                        Pasuvanthanai Police Station,
                        Tuticorin District.


                     4.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
                         Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                         Madurai.




                     5/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                           Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

                                              N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

rm

CRL.O.P.(MD)Nos.10736 & 10756 of 2018

02.11.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter