Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saravanan Sengoda Gounder ... vs Union Of India
2022 Latest Caselaw 10847 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10847 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022

Madras High Court
Saravanan Sengoda Gounder ... vs Union Of India on 22 June, 2022
                                                                              W.P.No.15412 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 Dated : 22.06.2022

                                                     CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                               W.P.No.15412 of 2022
                                        and W.M.P.Nos.14564 & 14565 of 2022

                  Saravanan Sengoda Gounder (DIN:03483392)                     .. Petitioner

                                                        Vs.
                  1.Union of India,
                    represented by its Ministry of Corporate affairs,
                    Shastri Bhawan,
                    Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road,
                    New Delhi – 110 001.

                  2.Registrar of Companies,
                    Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu,
                    Stock Exchange Building,
                    II-Floor, 683, Trichy Road, Singanallur,
                    Coimbatore – 641 005.                                      .. Respondents

                  Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                  praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
                  records of 2nd respondent relating to the impugned order dated 01.11.2018
                  uploaded in the website of 1st respondent, insofar as the petitioner herein is
                  concerned, quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merit and
                  consequently direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to use his
                  Director Identification Number and to act as Director of any existing
                  Company or to be appointed as a Director in any new company.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                  1/4
                                                                                 W.P.No.15412 of 2022



                                     For Petitioner   : Mr.Dhanaram Ramachandran

                                     For Respondents : Mr.L.Infant Dinesh
                                                       Central Government Standing Counsel


                                                      ORDER

This Writ petition has been filed challenging the disqualification of

the petitioner as a Director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act,

2013. The impugned order is dated 01.11.2018. The petitioner has

challenged the impugned order on the ground that no notice was issued to

him prior to his disqualification as a Director. The Director Identification

No.3483392 has also been deactivated/suspended under the impugned order

without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

2. The issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered by the decision of

the Division Bench of this Court in 'Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Mudalidharan

Vs. Union of India & another' dated 09.10.2020 in W.A.Nos.569, 718, 720,

721, 841 and 842 of 2020. In the said Division Bench judgment, the same

issue was involved where notice was not issued to the Director prior to

his/her disqualification. The Hon'ble Division Bench set aside the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.15412 of 2022

disqualification order and passed the following order:

“The publication of the list of disqualified directors by the ROC and the deactivation of the DIN of the appellants is hereby quashed. As a corollary to our conclusion on the deactivation of DIN, the DIN of the respective directors shall be reactivated within 30 days of the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Nonetheless, we make it clear that it is open to the ROC concerned to initiate action with regard to disqualification subject to an enquiry to decide the question of attribution of default to specific directors by taking into account the observations and conclusions herein.”

3. The petitioner in the instant case is similarly placed. Therefore, the

order of the Division Bench referred to supra applies to this case also and

similar direction needs to be issued in favour of the petitioner also by this

Court.

4. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 01.11.2018 passed by the

first respondent, uploaded in the website of the first respondent insofar as

the petitioner herein is concerned, is quashed. The status of disqualification

under Section 164(2)(a) against the Director Identification DIN No.3483392

is declared to be arbitrary, illegal and devoid of merits.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.15412 of 2022

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

Sni

5. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is allowed as prayed

for. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

22.06.2022

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No

Sni

To

1.Union of India, represented by its Ministry of Corporate affairs, Shastri Bhawan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001.

2.Registrar of Companies, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, Stock Exchange Building, II-Floor, 683, Trichy Road, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005.

W.P.No.15412 of 2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter