Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10579 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2022
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
B.Purushothaman ... Appellant
Versus
The State Represented by,
Inspector of Police,
Podanur P.S.Crime No,16 of 2018,
All Women Police Station,
East Police Station,
Coimbatore City. ... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision Petition filed u/s. 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C to
call for the records pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.2103 of 2022 in S.C.No.190 of
2021 passed by the Magalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore and
set aside the order dated 02.06.2022 by allowing this revision.
For Appellant : Mr.C.Emalias
for Mr. K.Balasubramaniam
For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
*****
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Revision is filed against the order the learned Magalir
Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore dated 02.06.2022 in
Crl.M.P.No.2103 of 2022 in S.C.No.190 of 2021, whereby the application filed
by the petitioner/Accused-1 for discharge has been dismissed.
2. It is seen that the final report proposed that the accused guilty for the
offence under Sections 120(B), 376, 494, 495, 109 read with 420 and 506(I) of
I.P.C
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, on the face of it,
there is a complaint of offence under Section 494 IPC and it is not a private
complaint and therefore, the said offence cannot be taken cognizance of based
on Police report. Once bigamy is alleged, the offence of rape disputing the
marriage itself, on the face of it is reduntant. Therefore, he would submit that
the entire case against the petitioner is untenable and the prayer was wrongly
dismissed by the trial Court.
4. On perusal of the materials available in this case, even though
prima facie, there is a force in the submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioner about the offence under Sections 376, 494 and 495 of IPC, however, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
a perusal of the material records of the case indicates the commission of the
offence under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) of IPC. Therefore, the petition for
discharge cannot be allowed. But however, the trial Court, while framing
charges shall take into account of the submissions made in respect of the
offence under Sections 376, 494 and 495 of IPC and therefore, this Criminal
Revision is ordered as follows:
(i) The order of the learned Magalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court),
Coimbatore dated 02.06.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.2103 of 2022 in S.C.No.190 of
2021 is upheld;
(ii) However, it is open to the petitioner to raise all the contentions in
respect of the charges for the offence under Sections 376, 494, 495 of IPC and
the same shall be duly taken into consideration by the learned Magistrate at the
time of framing of charges.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision is ordered.
20.06.2022
Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
To
1. Magalir Neethimandram (Mahila Court), Coimbatore
2. Inspector of Police, Podanur P.S. All Women Police Station, East Police Station, Coimbatore City.
3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
sma
Crl.R.C.No.732 of 2022
20.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!