Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10239 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2022
C.R.P.(PD).No.1746 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
C.R.P.(PD).No.1746 of 2022
and
C.M.P.No.8800 of 2022
A.Duraisamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
M.Chellammal ... Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to issue an order of direction, for transferring the suit in
O.S.No.350 of 2011 pending on the file of District Munsif Court, Attur to the
Subordinate Court, Attur to try along with the suit in O.S.No.24 of 2018 and
allow the above Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran
**********
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred challenging the order of
the learned Principal District Judge, Salem dated 26.11.2021 made in
Tr.O.P.No.33 of 2021.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD).No.1746 of 2022
2. The revision petitioner was the petitioner in the Transfer Original
Petition. The transfer petition was filed by the petitioner for transferring
OS.No.350 of 2011 pending on the file of the District Musif Court, Attur to
the Subordinate Court, Attur and to try it along with the other suit pending in
O.S.No.24 of 2018. The learned trial Judge dismissed the Transfer Original
Petition. Aggrieved over that the revision petitioner has preferred this
Revision.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has filed the
suit in OS.No.350 of 2011 for the relief of permanent injunction and
subsequently he has filed another suit in OS.No.24 of 2018 for the relief of
declaration and recovery of possession. Since the particulars of the suit
properties are one and the same, the interest of justice can be served if both
the suits are tired simultaneously in one Court.
4. On perusal of the order of the learned District Judge it is seen that in
the earlier case pending in OS.No.350 of 2011, the trial is already over and
even at the time of filing the transfer petition, the said case was pending for
judgment. The other suit has been filed after 7 years. If the petitioner is really
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD).No.1746 of 2022
aggrieved that the result of one of the suits would have a repercussion on the
other suit, he ought to have filed a petition under Section 10 to stay one suit
till disposal of the other suit. Instead of invoking such an option, he has
chosen to file Transfer Petition at the stage when the trial in the other suit has
been completed. At this stage even if the prayer of the petitioner is
considered, there cannot be any possibility for simultaneous trial or joint trial.
Therefore, I find no grounds to entertain this Revision.
5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
15.06.2022 Index: Yes/No Speaking / Non Speaking Order dsa To
1.The District Munsif, Attur.
2.The Subordinate Judge, Attur.
3.The Principal District Judge, Salem.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(PD).No.1746 of 2022
R.N.MANJULA, J
dsa
C.R.P.(PD).No.1746 of 2022
15.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!