Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Mohan vs C.Ethiraj
2022 Latest Caselaw 8235 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8235 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2022

Madras High Court
Vinod Mohan vs C.Ethiraj on 20 April, 2022
                                                                            CRP.(NPD)No.1048/2022


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 20.04.2022

                                                     CORAM:

                                           Mr. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                            C.R.P.(NPD)No.1048 of 2022
                                             and C.M.P.No.5369 of 2022

                     Vinod Mohan                                         ...Petitioner


                                                           Vs

                     1.Pappi Chetty Ragaviah Chetty's Charities,
                       Rep. by its Trustees,
                       1.C.Ethiraj
                       2.V.Sudhakar
                       3.V.Ram Mohan Gupta
                       4.Smt.V.Shantha Sridhar
                       5.G.Badrinarayana
                       6.J.V.Perumal
                       7.Y.V.Harikrishna
                       8.A.S.Hariprasad
                       9.V.Govardhan

                     2.A.Amarnath
                       Propriator M/s.Scooter Needs,
                       No.171, Poonamallee High Road,
                       Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.                     ...Respondents




                     Page 1 of 6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                        CRP.(NPD)No.1048/2022


                     PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
                     Constitution of India, to set aside the E.A.SR.No.55510 of 2021 in
                     E.A.No.1 of 2021 in E.P.No.650 of 2004 in O.S.No.3170 of 2003 dated
                     06.12.2021 on the file of the X Asst.Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.


                                               For Petitioner     :      Mr.K.Mohanamurali


                                                            ORDER

Heard, Mr.Mohanamurali, learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner, and

Mrs.Chitra Sampath, learned Senior Counsel for Ms.C.Jayachithra, learned

counsel for the respondents.

2.The facts are as below:

(a) that the plaintiff is a public charitable trust and that it laid the suit in

O.S.No.3170/2003 for eviction of its tenants. This suit came to be

decreed and promptly, the plaintiff laid E.P.No.650 of 2004 for

delivery of the property. The delivery too was ordered and when the

bailiff had gone to the property to effect delivery, this was obstructed

by the present revision petitioner claiming that he is a sub-tenant

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.(NPD)No.1048/2022

under the defendant.

(b) The plaintiff/decree holder would now file E.A.No.3564 of 2004 for

removing the obstruction under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. This came to

be dismissed by the execution Court, which order later came to be

confirmed by the first appellate court in A.S.No.21 of 2005.

Aggrieved by the same, the decree holder preferred a second appeal

in S.A.No.269/2009 before this Court, and after a full-fledged

hearing, this Court allowed the second appeal and directed removal of

obstruction which the revision petitioner herein has posed, and also

directed him to pay damages. This judgment was delivered by this

Court on 29.06.2012. In the meantime, the execution court has closed

the EP and it has directed that the decree holder could only take

symbolic possession of the property.

(c) After the decree in S.A.No.261 of 2009, the decree holder would now

move the execution court in E.A.No.1/2021 to revive E.P.No.650 of

2004. In this, notice was ordered to the revision petitioner and he has

filed his counter. Thereafter, he filed the present

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.(NPD)No.1048/2022

E.A.SR.No.55510/2021 for rejecting E.A.No.1 of 2021 raising almost

the same grounds which he has taken for resisting the very E.A.No.1

of 2021.

3.At this point of time, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner opted

to withdraw this Revision. This Civil Revision Petition is allowed to be

withdrawn. It is however, underscored that the Execution Court is required

to exercise its best caution and try to ensure that the decree obtained by the

respondent is executed at the very earliest and its agony is mitigated, lest the

legal system will lose all its relevance to the citizens of this Country.

4.Mr.Mohanamurali, learned counsel for the revision petitioner even offered

to negotiate with the decree holder, but that he can do, not before the Court

but otherwise. The Execution Court need not hold on its process merely on

the ground of a proposed peace offer made by the revision petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.(NPD)No.1048/2022

5.In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

20.04.2022 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Tsg/dk

To X Asst Judge, City Civil Court,

Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.(NPD)No.1048/2022

N.SESHASAYEE, J.,

Tsg/dk

C.R.P.(NPD)No.1048 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.5369 of 2022

20.04.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter