Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11904 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2021
W.A.No.1301 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.06.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
and
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
W.A.No.1301 of 2021
V.Lakshmi Veeraraghavan .. Appellant
Vs.
1.The Director,
Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land Tax,
Ezhilagam, Ground Floor,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Assistant Commissioner,
Urban Lank Ceiling and Urban Land Tax,
No.153, Karuneegar Street,
Adambakkam, Chennai – 88. .. Respondents
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order dated 05.07.2018 passed in W.P.No.16703 of 2018.
For Appellant : Mr.Rajarajan
for Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri
For Respondents : Mr.John J Raja Singh
Government Counsel
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
W.A.No.1301 of 2021
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
This appeal has been preferred by the appellant aggrieved over
the order of the learned Single Judge, who while declining to allow the
writ petition nonetheless held that it is not known as to how the
landlord can alienated the property which has been declared as excess
under the Urban Land Ceiling Act.
2. As rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant,
the claim itself is based upon the Government Order. The question as
to whether the appellant is entitled for the benefit is a matter to be
considered by the second respondent on the representation dated
19.03.2018. Whether the landlord has got prior notice and the
appellant is entitled to the benefit of the Government Order coupled
with the further fact that the said Government Order is applicable to
the case of the appellant, on the premise that he is a bonafide
purchaser for valuable consideration are the matters to be considered
by the second respondent. What the appellant requests is mere
consideration of his pending representation.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1301 of 2021
3. In such view of the matter, the order of the learned Single
Judge stands set aside and consequently,the second respondent is
directed to consider the representation of the appellant dated
19.03.2018 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this judgment. The appellant is further directed to give a copy
of the said representation along with the copy of the judgment in this
appeal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment.
4. The writ appeal stands allowed accordingly. No costs.
(M.M.S., J.) (R.N.M., J.)
17.06.2021
Index:Yes/No
mmi/ssm
To
1.The Director,
Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land Tax, Ezhilagam, Ground Floor, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2.The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Lank Ceiling and Urban Land Tax, No.153, Karuneegar Street, Adambakkam, Chennai – 88.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1301 of 2021
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
and R.N.MANJULA,J.
mmi
W.A.No.1301 of 2021
17.06.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!