Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Chandrasekaran vs Siddhi Vinayakar Temple
2021 Latest Caselaw 2940 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2940 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2021

Madras High Court
A.Chandrasekaran vs Siddhi Vinayakar Temple on 8 February, 2021
                                                                               CRP.PD.No.3253 of 2016

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 08.02.2021

                                                          CORAM

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                              CRP.PD.No. 3253 of 2016
                                                      and
                                               CMP.No.10723 of 2020

                    A.Chandrasekaran                                              ... Petitioner
                                                           Vs.
                    Siddhi Vinayakar Temple
                    Represented by its Trustee
                    Mr.Bhaskaran
                    S/o.Late R.Ganesan, Hindu
                    Aged about 54 years
                    68/112, IInd Street,
                    Sivagami Ammaiyar Colony
                    Sharma Nagar, Chennai - 39.                                  ... Respondent

                    PRAYER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
                    Constitution of India, praying to dismiss the suit O.S.No.978 of 2012, hit by
                    Section 11 CPC and re-litigation.


                                         For Petitioner     : Mr.V.Jayakumar

                                         For Respondent     : Mr.N.Nagusha




                    1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  CRP.PD.No.3253 of 2016



                                                       ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to strike off the plaint in

O.S.No.978 of 2012, on the ground that it is hit by Section 11 CPC and will

attract the principles of re-litigation.

2. The petitioner is the sole defendant in the said suit filed by the

respondent. The respondent filed the said suit for declaration, injunction and

recovery of the vacant possession from the hands of the petitioner herein.

While the suit was pending, the petitioner herein filed a petition for

rejection of plaint on the ground the present suit is barred by the principles

of “res-judicata” as the respondent continuously filed the suit for the very

same property, which was already decided before the Court of law.

3. On a perusal of the records, it shows that the father of the

respondent viz., Ganesan Thambiran filed a suit in O.S.No.1183 of 1979 for

declaration and recovery of possession for the property situated at No.20,

Vengu Pillai Street, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008, on the file of the VII

Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and the same was dismissed for

default by the judgment and decree dated 05.03.1983. It is pertinent to note

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRP.PD.No.3253 of 2016

here that the property in the present suit as well as the suit filed by his father

is one and the same, though the present suit is filed for recovery of

possession of the property ad-measuring 240 sq.ft situated at No.20, Vengu

Pillai Street, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. Therefore, both the property is

one and the same. In fact, the father of the respondent herein also filed

another suit in O.S.No.7721 of 1992 on the file of the XVII Assistant Judge,

City Civil Court, Chennai for permanent injunction and partition, in respect

of the very same property. The said suit was contested and dismissed by the

judgment and decree dated 30.01.1997. The plaintiff viz., the father of the

respondent herein had never been in possession of the said property, while

pending the suit or at the time of passing of the judgment in the suit and

therefore, the suit was dismissed.

4. Now, the present suit has been filed by the respondent viz., the son

of the plaintiff in O.S.No.1183 of 1979 and O.S.No.7721 of 1992 for

declaration and recovery of possession, in respect of the suit schedule

property. Though the earlier suit filed by his father was dismissed for

default, the decree had become final, since it was not challenged before any

Court of law. Therefore, the present suit is nothing but clear abuse of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRP.PD.No.3253 of 2016

process of law filed for the very same relief repeatedly. The present suit is

directly hit by the principles of “res-judicata” and it cannot be sustained as

against the petitioner herein.

5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The plaint in

O.S.No.978 of 2012 is hereby stuck-off from the file of the II Assistant

Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. Consequently, the connected

Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.



                                                                                            08.02.2021
                    Speaking/Non-speaking order
                    Index     : Yes/No
                    Internet : Yes/No
                    kv



                    To

The II Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRP.PD.No.3253 of 2016

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.

Kv

CRP.PD.No. 3253 of 2016

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRP.PD.No.3253 of 2016

08.02.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter