Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shiv Kumar Mahli vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 2878 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2878 MP
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Shiv Kumar Mahli vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 March, 2026

Author: Maninder S. Bhatti
Bench: Maninder S. Bhatti
          NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:23992




                                                              1                               WP-5002-2026
                              IN       THE    HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT JABALPUR
                                                        BEFORE
                                        HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI
                                                  ON THE 23rd OF MARCH, 2026
                                                WRIT PETITION No. 5002 of 2026
                                                   SHIV KUMAR MAHLI
                                                         Versus
                                       THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                           Appearance:
                                   Mrs. Sudha Goutam - Advocate for the petitioner.
                                   Shri Akshansh Shrivastava - Panel Lawyer for the State.

                                                                  ORDER

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:-

"i)To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus the respondents be directed to Reckon the petitioner's entire service from 17.09.2008 for all purposes, including seniority, pay fixation, increments, promotions, and other statutory benefits, granting all consequential arrears with 12% interest from the due dates till realization.

ii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus the respondents be directed to forthwith correct the petitioner's eligibility date as 17.09.2008 (date of Vyapam selection/result declaration) and merger date into Assistant Teacher Cadre as 15.10.2015 (date of acquiring D.Ed. qualification), in terms of Government Orders dated 03.05.2008, 05.10.2009, and Condition No. 16 of the appointment order dated 02.01.2014.

iii) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus the respondents be directed to restore the petitioner's name in the eligibility list for merger into Assistant Teacher Cadre, as per the order dated 19.07.2017, and forthwith, regularization/promotion considering 12+ years of continuous unblemished process his service by 2020.

iv) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus the respondents be directed to Grant notional promotion benefits, seniority parity with

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:23992

2 WP-5002-2026 similarly situated teachers in Madhya Pradesh who received merger from their D.Ed. date, and all consequential reliefs including ACP/MACP benefits.

v) Any other relief / reliefs order / orders, direction / directions which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper may kindly be granted to the petitioner including the cost of petition." 2 . The counsel for the petitioner contends that highlighting the aforesaid grievance the petitioner has moved a representation dated 11.10.2023 (Annexure P-9) before respondent No.3/Collector, District Seoni, which is still pending consideration, therefore, same be directed to be decided expeditiously.

3 . The aforesaid innocuous prayer is not opposed by the counsel for the respondents.

4. In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, without expressing any

view on the merit of the case, the petition stands disposed of with direction to respondent No.3, to take decision on petitioner's representation dated 11.10.2023 (Annexure P-9) in the light of the Circular, dated 05-10-2009 (Annexure-P/2) within a period of 60 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order by passing a well reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.

5 . If petitioner is found entitled and there is no impediment or embargo, the aforesaid benefits be extended to the petitioner within a further period of 30 days without compelling him to revisit this Court for the said purpose, otherwise reasons be communicated to the petitioner within the said period.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view on the merit of the case and respondent No.3 shall be at liberty to deal with the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:23992

3 WP-5002-2026 representation of the petitioner, in his own wisdom, in accordance with law.

(MANINDER S. BHATTI) JUDGE

ac

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter