Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

In Reference (Suo Moto) vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 3378 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3378 MP
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2026

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

In Reference (Suo Moto) vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 April, 2026

Author: Pranay Verma
Bench: Pranay Verma
           NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9448




                                                             1                             WP-12874-2026
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                        BEFORE
                                          HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA
                                                   ON THE 8 th OF APRIL, 2026
                                               WRIT PETITION No. 12874 of 2026
                                                IN REFERENCE (SUO MOTO)
                                                          Versus
                                              THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          Appearance:
                                  Dr. Amit Bhatia - Government Advocate for the respondent/State.

                                                                 ORDER

This petition has been registered on a reference having been made

by the VIth Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge Protection of Children from Sexual Offices Act, 2012 District Ujjain in compliance with the direction given by the Principal seat of this Court at Jabalpur by order dated 20.02.2025 passed in W.P No.5184 of 2025.

2. From the report submitted by the Court concerned, it is seen that the same is in respect of grant of permission to the victim for termination of her pregnancy. She is a victim of a crime registered by Crime No.71/2026 under

Section 5(j)(ii)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012. During course of investigation, she was found to be pregnant and was medically examined and the fetus was reported to be of 30 weeks 2 days. At the time of her examinations she expressed her willingness for termination of the pregnancy. Her parents also expressed their willingness. The victim was examined by the Medical Board at M.T.H., M.G.M. Medical College Indore,

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9448

2 WP-12874-2026 on 07.04.2026 and the report has been submitted by the Board to the effect that the termination of the pregnancy can be allowed. Along with the report the statements of the parents of the victim have also been annexed.

3. Section 3 and 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 reads as under:-

"3. When Pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy

may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner-

(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twelve weeks' if such medical practitioner is, or (b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks but does not exceed twenty weeks, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are of opinion, formed in good faith, that,-

(i) the continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury physical or mental health ; or

(ii) there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9448

3 WP-12874-2026 Explanation 1.-Where any, pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by such pregnancy shall be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

Explanation 2 .-Where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any married woman or her husband for the purpose of limiting the number of children, the anguish caused by such unwanted pregnancy may be presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.

(3) In determining whether the continuance of pregnancy would involve such risk of injury to the health as is mentioned in sub-section (2), account may be taken of the pregnant woman's actual or reasonable foreseeable environment.

(4) (a) No pregnancy of a woman, who has not attained the age of eighteen years, or, who, having attained the age of eighteen years, is a lunatic, shall be terminated except with the consent in writing of her guardian.

(b) Save as otherwise provided in C1.(a), no pregnancy shall be terminated except with the consent of the pregnant woman. 5. Sections 3 and 4 when not to apply.- (1) The provisions of Sec.4 and so much of the provisions of sub-section (2) of Sec. 3 as relate to the length of the pregnancy and the opinion of not less

than two registered medical practitioner, shall not apply to the

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-IND:9448

4 WP-12874-2026 termination of a pregnancy by the registered medical practitioner in case where he is of opinion, formed in good faith, that the termination of such pregnancy is immediately necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman."

4. This Court keeping in view the statutory provisions as contained in The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971 is of the opinion that in the peculiar facts and circumstance of the case, the pregnancy can be terminated and it is ordered accordingly.

5. The Head of Department (HOD) at M.T.H., Indore is directed to carryout the termination of pregnancy after optimization of hemoglobin and potassium. The petitioner 'X' shall appear before the H.O.D. at M.T.H., Indore on 09.04.2026 at 11.00 A.M. The Head of Department of Gynecologist, Head of Department of Anesthesia and all other specialist will remain present at the time of termination of pregnancy, as the petitioner 'X is of tender age. Not only this, after termination of pregnancy is carried out, the State of Madhya Pradesh shall ensure post operative care of the petitioner 'X'. The entire expenditure in respect of termination of pregnancy shall be borne by the State of M.P. through Collector, Indore and the DNA of fetus shall also be preserved for DNA analysis.

6. With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands allowed.

(PRANAY VERMA) JUDGE

jyoti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter