Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Rauf @ Laddan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 5316 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5316 MP
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Abdul Rauf @ Laddan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 March, 2025

Author: Anand Pathak
Bench: Anand Pathak
                                                    1

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                      AT GWALIOR
                                         LOK ADALAT
                  HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
                                   &
                  SHRI HARISH DIXIT, SENIOR ADVOCATE

                               ON THE 8th OF MARCH, 2025

                     CRIMINAL REVISION NO.4234 of 2019

                                   ABDUL RAUF @ LADDAN
                                                   Vs.
                               STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPEARANCE:
        Shri Pawan Vijaywargiya - Advocate for the petitioner.
        Shri R.S. Yadav - Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              ORDER

Per. Justice Anand Pathak

1. The present petition under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20/08/2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sheopur, District- Sheopur (M.P.) in Criminal Appeal No.02/2019 modifying the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13/10/2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, District- Sheopur (M.P.) by which he has been sentenced as under:

            Section                  Sentence                                 Fine
         323 of IPC                   1 Year RI            Rs.1000/- with default stipulation.

2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the present case pertains to offence under Section 323 of IPC. The offence is of the year 2013 and petitioner suffered more than 14 days incarceration as pre and post trial confinement. Further from the date

of incident, petitioner suffered almost 12 years' ordeal of trial. Hence, it is submitted that the case of petitioner be considered for the sentence which is already undergone by him, for which he is ready to pay compensation/fine at higher side in view of provisions of Section 357 of Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the prayer.

However, he fairly accepted that if petitioner is ready to pay the enhanced fine amount/compensation, then only his case for undergone may be considered so that enhanced amount (fine) can be given to the complainant.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, especially looking to the fact that for about 12 years, petitioner has suffered ordeal of trial and the proceedings before the trial court, appellate court and as well as before this Court and the fact that petitioner has suffered incarceration also, jail sentence of petitioner is reduced to the period already undergone by him maintaining the conviction recorded by the Courts below and in view of Section 357 of Cr.P.C., the fine amount which has been imposed by the Courts below is hereby enhanced. Petitioner is directed to pay enhanced compensation of Rs.2,000/- (in addition to the fine amount imposed by Courts below) within two months from today while giving undertaking before the trial Court that if he fails to pay the enhanced amount of compensation i.e. Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) within stipulated period of time, then the trial Court shall proceed against the petitioner to serve remaining part of his jail sentence for which the Courts below have sentenced him. It is made clear that this benefit of undergone has been given to the petitioner in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case where petitioner has

suffered incarceration also. The enhanced compensation amount shall be paid to the complainant/State after due verification. Petitioner is on bail. His bail bonds stand discharged.

5. Resultantly, the revision petition preferred by the petitioner stands disposed of in above terms.

6. Copy of the judgment be sent to the trial Court concerned for information and necessary compliance.

                                                         (ANAND PATHAK)                               (HARISH DIXIT)
                                                            MEMBER                                      MEMBER


     rahul

RAHUL

             DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
             PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT
             OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR,


SINGH

2.5.4.20=eac942476567cd1b39b3da460684034 62fdf82ab676d0cde4dee473fe77953f5, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh, serialNumber=0275C4F803F94C47998BE5C534

PARIHAR E21BDED910FD4AB9D159B55575E814D05B2EE D, cn=RAHUL SINGH PARIHAR Date: 2025.03.19 13:40:51 -07'00'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter