Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prakashchandra vs Reena
2025 Latest Caselaw 7041 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7041 MP
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Prakashchandra vs Reena on 24 June, 2025

Author: Dwarka Dhish Bansal
Bench: Dwarka Dhish Bansal
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:27137




                                                               1                             SA-1456-2025
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                   AT JABALPUR
                                                       BEFORE
                                     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
                                                    ON THE 24th OF JUNE, 2025
                                               SECOND APPEAL No. 1456 of 2025
                                                       PRAKASHCHANDRA
                                                            Versus
                                                            REENA
                          Appearance:
                             Shri Yogesh Mohan Tiwari - Advocate for the appellant.

                                                                   ORDER

This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant/defendant challenging the judgment and decree dated 9/5/2025 passed by Fourth District Judge, Burhanpur in Regular Civil Appeal No.5/2025 affirming the judgment and decree dated 19/12/2024 passed by Fourth Civil Judge Senior Division, Burhanpur in RCSA No.36A/2021, whereby Courts below have concurrently decreed the suit for eviction on the ground of residential need available under Section 12(1)(e) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short "the Act").

2. It is undisputed fact available on record that one Yashwant was owner and landlord of the rented house, who vide registered sale deed dated 30/10/1998 (Ex.P/1) sold the house to Rajkunwarbai, who in turn executed a registered gift deed dated 25/10/2017 (Ex.P/2) in favour of plaintiff-Reena and on that basis, she instituted the suit for eviction on 4/2/2021, as such, there is a relationship of landlord and tenant in between the plaintiff and defendant. It is also undisputed fact available on record that the plaintiff has

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:27137

2 SA-1456-2025

no other alternative accommodation in the township of Burhanpur and she is residing with her husband.

3. In the case of Kishore Singh vs. Satish Kumar Singhvi, 2017(3) JLJ 375 , a coordinate Bench of this Court has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ragavendra Kumar vs. Firm Prem Machinary and Company, AIR 2000 SC 534 , and held that the findings recorded on the question of bonafide requirement do not give rise to any substantial question of law.

4. After arguing at length and in the light of legal position settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court and in view of the concurrent judgment and decree passed by Courts below, learned counsel for the

appellant/defendant/tenant prays for withdrawal of this second appeal and prays for grant of one year's time i.e. upto 30/6/2026 to vacate the tenanted premises.

5. In view of prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant, by declining interference in the impugned judgment and decree passed by Courts below, this Court deems fit to grant time for vacating the tenanted premises upto 30/6/2026 on the following conditions:-

(i) The appellant/defendant/tenant shall vacate the tenanted premises on or before 30/6/2026.

(ii) The appellant/defendant/tenant shall regularly pay monthly rent to the respondent/landlord and shall also clear all the dues, if any, including the costs of the litigation, if any, imposed by Courts below, within a period of 30 days.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:27137

3 SA-1456-2025

(iii) The appellant/defendant/tenant shall not part with the tenanted premises to anybody and shall not change nature of the same.

(iv) The appellant/defendant/tenant shall furnish an undertaking with regard to the aforesaid conditions within a period of three weeks before the learned Court below/Executing Court.

(v) If the appellant/defendant/tenant fails to comply with any of the aforesaid conditions, the respondent/landlord shall be free to execute the decree forthwith.

(vi) If after filing of the undertaking, the appellant/defendant/tenant does not vacate the tenanted premises on or before 30/6/2026 and creates any obstruction, he shall be liable to pay mesne profits of Rs.500/- per day, so also contempt of order of this Court.

(vii) It is made clear that the appellant/defendant/tenant shall not be entitled for further extension of time after 30/6/2026.

6. With the aforesaid observations, this second appeal is hereby dismissed/disposed off as withdrawn.

7. Misc. application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed.

(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE

Arun*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter