Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3186 MP
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025
1 WP-20937-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
WP No. 20937 of 2024
(SMT. RAMPYARI VISHWAKARMA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS )
Dated : 22-01-2025
Shri A.S. Thakur - Advocate for petitioner.
Shri V.P. Tiwari - Government Advocate for State on advance copy.
Heard on I.A. No.15657 of 2024 - an application for amendment in the
writ petition.
Counsel appearing for the State has heavily objected for the
amendment. Despite time granted to the State to file response to the
amendment application no reply has been filed. However, the counsel has
orally objected the same pointing out the fact that there is substantial delay in
approaching the Court.
The fact remains that the family pension is being claimed by the
petitioner which is a recurring cause of action in view of the judgment passed
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of cases. Petitioner's counsel has
relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
S.K. Mastan Been vs. General Manager, South Central Railways, (2003) 1
SCC 184.
Under these circumstances, as the family pension claimed by the
petitioner is a recurring cause of action there is no substantial delay in
approaching the Court, therefore, I.A. No.15657 of 2024 stands allowed.
Necessary correction to be carried out within seven working days.
Issue notice to the respondents on payment of process fee within seven
2 WP-20937-2024 working days by RAD made.
As the family pension has been claimed in the matter, the respondents are expected to file the reply expeditiously.
(VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE
THK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!