Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramnivas vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 8212 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8212 MP
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ramnivas vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 April, 2025

Author: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
Bench: Sanjeev S Kalgaonkar
                                                            1                               CRA-2959-2025
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                    CRA No. 2959 of 2025
                                             (RAMNIVAS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )



                          Dated : 22-04-2025
                                Shri Aditya Raj Singh Solanki - Advocate for the appellant.

                                Shri Amit Raval - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.

Record of the trial Court has been received.

Being arguable, the appeal is admitted for final hearing. Also heard on I.A. No. 3980/2025, first application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C./Sec 430(1) of BNSS, 2023 moved on behalf of appellant - Ramniwas seeking suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Appellant stood convicted u/S 74 of BNS and sentenced to undergo 01 year sentence of rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/- with default stipulation vide judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28.02.2025, passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, District Dewas(M.P.) in S.T. No.244/2024.

Learned Counsel for appellant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the impugned judgment passed by learned Trial Court is based on assumption, conjectures and surmises. He further contends that the learned Trial Court has committed an error in convicting the appellant on sole testimony of complainant after ignoring the inconsistencies and improbabilities in her evidence. The FIR was delayed without any plausible explanation. The appellant was convicted on testimony of interested and related witnesses, ignoring the defense evidence. Appellant

2 CRA-2959-2025

was on bail during trial and he did not misuse the liberty so granted. Sentence of imprisonment of appellant is suspended u/S 389(1) of Cr.P.C. by the trial Court. There is no likelihood of early hearing of appeal in near future. On these grounds, learned counsel prays that execution of remaining jail sentence of appellant may be suspended and he may be enlarged on bail.

Per contra, learned Counsel for respondent State opposes the application and prays for its rejection.

Upon hearing learned Counsel for the parties, but without commenting upon rival contentions touching merits of the case, this Court is of the view that application deserves to be allowed. It is, accordingly directed that execution of remaining jail sentence of appellant shall remain suspended during pendency of this appeal and he shall be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court for compliance with following conditions:-

(1). The appellant shall deposit the amount of fine (if not deposited) forthwith;

(2). The appellant shall appear before the Trial Court on 16.06.2025 and on such further dates as may be directed by the Trial Court; (3). The appellant shall ensure hearing of the appeal on the date fixed for such hearing and shall also ensure proper legal representation on his behalf, on the date notified for hearing.

In case of breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, this order granting suspension of sentence shall become ineffective. The Trial Court shall be authorized to grant exemption from attendance to

3 CRA-2959-2025 the appellant on any date, on sufficient cause being shown [Chapter XIII Rule 42 Sub-Rule 2 of the M.P. High Court Rules, 2008]. Where the appellant does not appear on the date of his appearance before the Trial Court and no sufficient cause for non-appearance is shown, the Trial Court shall be authorized to issue non-bailable/bailable warrants to secure his attendance under intimation to the Registry of High Court. The Trial Court shall also proceed under Section 446 of CrPC against such appellant and his surety without any reference to this Court and without any impediment of the order granting bail. [Chapter XIII Rule 42 Sub-Rule 3 of M.P. High Court Rules, 2008].

On arrest/surrender in compliance with the warrant, the appellant shall be forwarded in custody to undergo sentence of imprisonment under intimation to the Registry of this Court.

Accordingly, I.A. No.3980/2025 stands allowed and disposed of. List for final hearing in due course.

Certified copy as per rules.

(SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR) JUDGE

sh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter