Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Aran Pharmacitucals Through ... vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 12764 MP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12764 MP
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2024

Madhya Pradesh High Court

M/S Aran Pharmacitucals Through ... vs Union Of India on 6 May, 2024

Author: Vivek Rusia

Bench: Vivek Rusia

                                             (1)

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH,
                    AT GWALIOR

                    WRIT PETITION NO. 18629 of 2023
BETWEEN :-

        M/S    ARAN    PHARMACITUCALS    THROUGH
        PROPRIETOR MR. RAM NIWAS AGARWAL, S/O LATE
        SHRI B.L.AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O
        RAMKALA NAGAR MORAR GWALIOR (MADHYA
        PRADESH)

                                                                 .....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI NITIN SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE)

AND
        1.  UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
        MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE,
        NIRMAN BHAWAN, MAULANA AZAD ROAD, NEW
        DELHI

        2.    DRUG CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA,
        DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES,
        CENTRAL     DRUGS       STANDE     CONTROL
        ORGANIZATION, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY
        WELFARE, FDA BHAVAN, ITO KOTLA ROAD, NEW
        DELHI


                                                            .....RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI PRAVEEN NEWASKAR - DEPUTY SOLICITOR
GENERAL)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri
Justice Vivek Rusia pronounced the following:
                                        (2)

                               ORDER

Petitioner has filed the present petition, under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking quashment of notification S.O. 2398(E)

dated 2/6/2023 (Annexure P/1) and also seeking writ in the nature of

mandamus commanding the respondents to withdraw the impugned

notification. By way of interim relief, petitioner is seeking permission to

sale the drugs which are already in the distribution channel.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar facts and

circumstances, a co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court at Indore in

W.P. No.14982 of 2023, by way of interim relief, has granted permission

to sell the stock lying at the factory, which had been manufactured on or

before 2nd June, 2023. The petitioner is also ready to give undertaking

about further manufacturing drugs fixed dose combination of

Cholrpheniramine Maleate + Codeine Syrup (Subject Fixed Dose

Combination/Subject FDC) under the brand name of Rankuf Syrup

pursuant to notification dated 2/6/2023.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that

petitioner cannot be permitted to sale the drug, which is prohibited.

Petitioner is a pharmaceutical company engaged in the production of

various medicinal drugs including fixed dose combination (FDC) of

Chlorpheniramine Maleate + Codeine Syrup under the brand name of

Rankuf Syrup since 2017. Vide notification dated 2/6/2023, in exercise

of powers conferred under section 26A of the Drug and Cosmetic Act,

1940, the Central Government has prohibited the manufacture for sale,

sale or distribution for human use of drug fixed dose combination of

Chlopheniramine Maleate + Codeine Syrup with immediate effect. The

aforesaid notification has been issued in compliance of the judgment

dated 15/12/2017 passed by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India

Vs. Pfizer Ltd. and Others (Civil Appeal No. 22792 of 2017).

Therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to examine the validity of the

aforesaid notification.

4. So far as the grant of interim relief to sell the manufactured syrup

is concerned, there is no such final relief to this effect in this petition.

After sell of manufactured drug/syrup, the petitioner will lose interest in

this petition and the purpose of filing the petition would be served as the

validity of the impugned notification is not assailable. The syrup which is

not suitable for human consumption, cannot be permitted to be sold in

open market. Petitioner filed this petition in the month of July, 2023

which came up for hearing on 3/8/2023 and petitioner sought time to

address this Court on the question of jurisdiction. Now, more than 9

months have passed. Therefore, after nine months no permission can be

granted for sale of manufactured drug/syrup.

The petition, accordingly, stands dismissed.

                      (VIVEK RUSIA)                 (RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI)
                        JUDGE                               JUDGE
(and)





 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter