Ram Milan Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 5152 MP

                                                             1
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                   AT JABALPUR
                                                   MCRC No. 13517 of 2023
                                           (RAM MILAN SAHU Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

                          Dated : 28-03-2023
                                None for the applicant.

                                Shri C.S. Parmar - Govt. Advocate for respondent/State.

Division Bench of this Court has taken suo motu cognizance of communication made by Chairman of State Bar Council of M.P asking entire Lawyer community in State of M.P. to abstain from Court work.

In PIL vide order dated 24.3.2023 passed in W.P. No.7295/2023 in para- 18 following directions were issued:-

"18. Under these circumstances, since the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been violated and keeping in mind the interest of the poor litigants, we deem it just and necessary to issue the following directions:- (i ) All the advocates throughout the State of Madhya Pradesh are hereby directed to attend to their court work forthwith. They shall represent their clients in the respective cases before the respective courts forthwith;

(ii) If any lawyer deliberately avoids to attend the court, it shall be presumed that there is disobedience of this order and he will be faced with serious consequences including initiation of proceedings for contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act;

(iii) If any lawyer prevents any other lawyer from attending the court work, the same would be considered as disobedience of these directions and he will be faced with serious consequences including initiation of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act;

(iv) Each of the judicial officers are directed to submit a report as to which lawyer has deliberately abstained from attending the court;

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR PATEL Signing time: 3/29/2023 5:53:30 PM

(v) The judicial officers shall also mention the names of advocates who have prevented other advocates from entering the court premises or from conducting their cases in the court;

(vi) Such advocates shall be dealt with seriously which may even include proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act as well as being debarred from practice." Division Bench had issued directions to Advocates to attend the Court work forthwith and to represent their clients in their respective cases. If abstention from work is deliberate then Advocate will have to face serious consequences including initiation of contempt petition.

In view of same, as Advocates for the parties are not appearing in the

case, Registry is directed to issue show cause notice to counsel for the petitioner(s) as well as counsel for the respondent(s) whose name appears in the Vakalatnama to give explanation why Contempt Proceedings may not be initiated against him/her/them for deliberate violation of order dated 24.3.2023 passed in W.P. No.7295/2023.

Notices shall not be issued to Government Advocates appearing for State since they remained present in Court and complied with directions passed in W.P. No.7295/2023.

List the matter after four weeks.

(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE

sp/-

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR PATEL Signing time: 3/29/2023 5:53:30 PM