Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4963 MP
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
WP No. 6449 of 2023
(M/S NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD Vs DIVISIONAL DEPUTY AND OTHERS)
Dated : 27-03-2023
None for the counsel authorized by the petitioner in the Power of
Attorney is present.
Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, Government Advocate for the respondent
State.
I n respect of a call given by the M.P. State Bar Council asking the
members of the Bar in the State of M.P. to abstain from Court work w.e.f 23.03.2023, the Division Bench of this Court took suo motu cognizance of the situation in W.P. No. 7295/2023 (In Reference (Suo Motu) vs. Chairman, State Bar Council of M.P. and Others) and passed order on 24.03.2023, the operative portion of which is reproduced below for ready reference and convenience:-
" 1 8 . Under these circumstances, since the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has been violated and keeping in mind the interest of the poor litigants, we deem it just and necessary to issue the following directions:-
(i) All the advocates throughout the State of Madhya Pradesh are hereby directed to attend to their court work forthwith. They shall represent their clients in the respective cases before the respective courts forthwith;
(ii) If any lawyer deliberately avoids to attend the court, it shall be presumed that there is disobedience of this order and he will be faced with serious consequences including initiation of proceedings for contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act;
(iii) If any lawyer prevents any other lawyer from attending the court work, the same would be considered as disobedience of these directions and he will be faced with serious consequences including initiation of proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act;
(iv) Each of the judicial officers are directed to submit a report as to which lawyer has deliberately abstained from attending the court;
Signature Not Verified Signed by: VIVEK KUMAR TRIPATHI Signing time: 3/28/2023 10:21:27 AM
(v) The judicial officers shall also mention the names of advocates w h o have prevented other advocates from entering the court premises or from conducting their cases in the court;
(vi) Such advocates shall be dealt with seriously which may even include proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act as well as being debarred from practice.
Th e Registry is directed to ensure that all the respondents are served with the notice of this petition as well as of this order forthwith.
Post after service of notice."
Despite writ of mandamus having been issued by Coordinate Bench on 24.03.2023, counsel for petitioner Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, Shri Amit Shrivastava and Shri Mohan Patel, despite being authorized by petitioner vide Power of Attorney, are abstaining from Court work.
This prima facie amounts to disobedience of the writ of mandamus issued on 24.03.2023 in W.P. No. 7295/2023.
Accordingly, Registry is directed to issue show cause notice to Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, Shri Amit Shrivastava and Shri Mohan Patel, to explain before the next date of hearing as to why proceedings for contempt be not initiated against them for disobedience of order passed by the Division Bench on 24.03.2023 in W.P. No. 7295/2023.
Registry is further directed to maintain a separate file qua the contempt notice.
List after two weeks.
(SHEEL NAGU) (VIRENDER SINGH)
JUDGE JUDGE
vivek
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VIVEK KUMAR
TRIPATHI
Signing time: 3/28/2023
10:21:27 AM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!