Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9539 MP
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
FA No. 1130 of 2019
(SMT. POOJA PANDEY Vs PRABHAKAR PANDEY)
Dated : 23-06-2023
None for appellant.
None for respondent.
None present when the case is called in the second round. This Court on last occasion had passed the following order : "Considering the fact that challenge is to an ex parte decree of divorce passed in favour of the husband, it would be appropriate to ascertain whether an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC was filed by the wife or not?
List next week.
A copy of this order be communicated to the learned counsel for complainant/wife."
In absence of counsel for the appellant, registry is directed to requisition the report of Family Court, Umaria which had passed the impugned ex-parte judgment and decree that whether any MJC under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC was filed by the wife to set aside ex-parte decree or not?
List after four weeks.
(SHEEL NAGU) (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH)
JUDGE JUDGE
Shub
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SHUBHAM
THAKKER
Signing time: 6/26/2023
6:45:29 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!