Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Khalil Ur Rehman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2023 Latest Caselaw 10372 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10372 MP
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Khalil Ur Rehman vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 July, 2023
Author: Dinesh Kumar Paliwal
                                                               1
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT JABALPUR
                                                       CRA No. 8627 of 2023
                                      (KHALIL UR REHMAN AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

                          Dated : 07-07-2023
                                Shri Rajendra Raghuvanshi - Advocate for the appellants.

                                Smt. Geeta Yadav - Panel Lawyer for the respondent /State.

Call for trial Court record.

Heard on I.A.No.16029/2023, an application under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to the appellants

pending the appeal.

The appellants have been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 420 (on 2 counts), 468 (on 2 counts) and 120B of IPC and have been sentenced to R.I. for 03 years for each offence and fine of Rs.5000/- for each offence on each counts with default stipulations, by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal vide judgment dated 21.6.2023 p as s ed in S.T. No.599/2008 (State of M.P. Vs. Ganesh Kumar Iyer and others).

Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that appellants have been released on bail till 20.7.2023 by the trial Court itself. During trial, they

were on bail and they have not misused the liberty granted to them b y way of bail. Learned counsel further submitted that they have fair chances to succeed in appeal. There is no possibility of coming of this appeal for hearing in near future. Therefore, if the jail sentence is not suspended, the purpose of filing this appeal would become futile.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellants.

Considering the short nature of sentence and contention of learned Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEEPA MISHRA Signing time: 7/7/2023 6:01:04 PM

counsel for the appellants, I deem it proper to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellants because final hearing of this appeal is not possible in near future.

Consequently, I.A.No.16029/2023 is allowed. The execution of jail sentence of appellants is hereby suspended subject to depositing the fine amount, if not already deposited. It is directed that the appellants - Khalil Ur Rehman and Rajkumar Rai be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond to a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) each with one solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court with a further direction to appear before the trial Court on 5.9.2023 and

also on such other dates, as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.

List the case for admission immediately after receipt of record.

(DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL) JUDGE

mrs. mishra

Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEEPA MISHRA Signing time: 7/7/2023 6:01:04 PM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter