Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21927 MP
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAV
ON THE 20 th OF DECEMBER, 2023
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 21280 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
AJAY KUMAR TANDAN S/O SHRI JANAKSINGH, AGED
ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT, R/O 203
AKANKSHA APARTMENT CITY CENTER GWALIOR
PERMANENT R/O VILLAGE THARA DISTRICT MORENA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(MR. JITENDRA DIXIT - ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER)
AND
1. SUBHASH CHANDRA JIVARIYA S/O SHRI
RAMRATAN JEVARIYA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/O E/147 SECTOR 52 NOIDA GAUTAMBUDDH
NAGAR UP (UTTAR PRADESH)
2. SOURABH JEWARIYA S/O SHRI SUBHAS, AGED
ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O E-
147 SECTOR -52 NOIDA GAUTAMBHUDDHA
NAGAR U.P. (UTTAR PRADESH)
3. SHUBHAM JEWARIYA S/O SHRI SUBHASH
JEWARIYA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O E-147
SECTOR -52 NOIDA GAUTAMBHUDDHA NAGAR
U.P. (UTTAR PRADESH)
4. THE STATE OF MP THROUGH POLICE STATION
CRIME BRANCH DISRICT GWALIOR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3, EVEN THOUGH
VAKALATNAMA HAS BEEN FILED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS NO. 1
TO 3.)
This application coming on for Admission this day, the court passed the
Signature Not Verified
following:
Signed by: LOKENDRA JAIN
Signing time: 12/21/2023
9:57:50 AM
2
ORDER
This petition under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed for quashing the FIR in connection with Crime No.75 of 2022 registered at Police Station Crime Branch, District Gwalior against the respondents No. 1 to 3 for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 409 of IPC and Section 66(d) of I.T. Act and all consequential proceedings arising out of it.
I.A.No.8723 of 2023 and I.A. No.8724 of 2023 have also been filed jointly by the petitioner as well as respondents no.1 to 3. The application is duly signed by both the parties and are supported by affidavits of respective parties.
In compliance of the order dated 01.12.2023 passed by this Court, the
factum of compromise has been verified by the Principal Registrar of this Court, who has recorded statement of respondents no.1 to 3 as well as complainant/petitioner and has submitted a report that the parties have arrived at compromise voluntarily without any threat, inducement and coercion.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has entered into a compromise with the respondents No. 1 to 3 and, therefore, the present petition has been filed for compounding the offence on the basis of compromise.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record as well as verification report submitted by Principal Registrar of this Court.
In the light of the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Ramavtar Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 966, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab, [(2012) 10 SCC 303], and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr., [(2014) 6 SCC 466] , Jagdish
Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another (AIR 2008 SC 1968), Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab (AIR 2008 SC 1969), Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another (2011) 10 SCC 705, and considering the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute as well as the nature of offence which cannot be said to be an offence against the society at large, this Court allows this petition with a direction that the proceedings of Crime No.75 of 2022 registered at Police Station Crime Branch, District Gwalior against the respondents No. 1 to 3 for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 409 of IPC read with Section 66(d) of I.T Act and all consequential proceedings arising out of it are hereby quashed.
This petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC stands disposed of in above terms.
CC as per rules.
(SUNITA YADAV) JUDGE (LJ*)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!