Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 20617 MP
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGH
ON THE 6 th OF DECEMBER, 2023
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 49686 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
1. SUNIL KUMAR S/O MULCHAND BIJWA, AGED
ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR
VILLAGE BISALWAS SONIGARA, P.S. AND TEHSIL
NEEMUCH, DISTT. NEEMUCH (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. GULABCHAND S/O RAMLAL HAGAYARI, AGED
ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR
VILLAGE BISALWAS SONIGARA P.S. AND TEHSIL
NEEMUCH (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(SHRI NILESH DAVE, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER .
AND
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH P.S. C.B.N. NEEMUCH,
DISTT. NEEMUCH (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SONI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE
RESPONDENT .
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 49324 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
SANJAY S/O MOHANLAL BALAI, AGED ABOUT 32
YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOR R/O VILLAGE DOWAD
TEHSIL NEEMUCH (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(SHRI AMIT SINGH SISODIA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER
.
AND
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: AMIT KUMAR
Signing time: 12/8/2023
11:33:57 AM
2
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CBN NEEMUCH (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI MANOJ KUMAR SONI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE
RESPONDENT .
These applications coming on for admission this day, the court passed
the following:
ORDER
Heard analogously, perused the case diary and both the applications are being decided with this common order.
These are first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C in connection with crime No.27/2023, registered at P.S - C.B.N.Neemuch, District - Neemuch
(M.P.) for offence punishable under Section 8/18, 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1885. The applicants are in custody since 23.07.2023 & 04.08.2023 respectively.
( 2 ) As per prosecution story, 6kgand 520grams Opium has been recovered from the possession of the co-accused Kamal and the applicants have been implicated in the on the basis of mamaorandum statements of co- accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act.
(3) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is alleged that at the instance of applicant, 6.520 kg Opium was seized from other co-accused person namely Kamal and the applicants have been implicated in the on the basis of mamaorandum statements of co-accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act. Hence, it is submitted that the applicants cannot be liable for other quantity seized from the co-accused. It is furher submitted that similarly situated co-accused Dinesh has already been granted bail by this Court in
MCRC No.43914/2023 and the applicants are having parity with him. They are in jail since 23.07.2023 & 04.08.2023 respectively. Under these circumstances, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.
(4) Counsel for State opposes the prayer and submitted that since on the information of the present applicant, commercial quantity was seized from the co-accused Kamal, therefore, the applicant is liable for abetment and bar of Section 37 of NDPS Act would be applicable. Counsel has also placed reliance upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court, in the case of Union of India (NCB) ETC Vs. Khalil Uddin ETC [CRA no. 1841 - 1842/ 2022] as well as on Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh an @ Pappu passed in CRA No. (5) So far as the judgement relied upon by counsel for the State/CBN are concerned, the facts of the aforesaid cases are different to the facts of this Court, hence, they are distinguishable. Further, having gone through the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the fact that nothing was seized from the applications and their custody period, I am of the view that it is a case in which applicants may be released on bail. Consequently, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this first bail applications u/s. 439 of Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicants are allowed.
6. It is directed that the applicant/accused be released on bail on their
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand only)each with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. It is also directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.
C.C. as per rules.
(PREM NARAYAN SINGH) JUDGE amit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!