Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kanwarlal vs Union Of India
2023 Latest Caselaw 6187 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6187 MP
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kanwarlal vs Union Of India on 18 April, 2023
Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla
                                                               1
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                        CRA No. 7219 of 2022
                                                       (KANWARLAL Vs UNION OF INDIA)



                           Dated : 18-04-2023
                                Shri Abhishek Rathore - Advocate for the appellant.

                                Shri Manoj Soni - Advocate for the respondent.

1. Heard on IA No.1372/2023, which is first application for suspension of sentence on behalf of appellant Kanwarlal.

2. The appellant has been convicted under section 8/18 of the NDPS

Act and sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and default stipulations.

3. The prosecution case is that on a secret information, the police intercepted a vehicle and asked their names and found 3 kg 100 grams of opium, which was tied up on the stomach of co-accused Vikram Singh who was sitting at the back of present appellant. The allegation against the appellant is that he was driving the motorcycle and the illegal opium has been seized from joint possession of the present appellant and co-accused Vikram Singh.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the prosecution has failed to prove that the appellant had knowledge that the other co-accused Vikram Singh was carrying contraband and was conniving with the said accused in carrying with the contraband. Since the prosecution has failed to prove the knowledge on the part of the present appellant, the conviction is prima-facie unsustainable. In support of his submissions, he has placed

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SOURABH YADAV Signing time: 20/04/2023 10:11:17 AM

reliance on the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Sorabkhan and Anor Vs. State of Gujarat reported in (2004) 13 SCC 608 and Avtar Singh and Ors Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2002) 7 SCC 419. Apart from the aforesaid submission he also submitted that the appellant has already undergone the jail sentence of more than five year and eight months and final hearing of the appeal would take time.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant in support of his submission, has placed reliance on the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case o f Sanjay vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Criminal Appeal No.104 of 2015 dated 17.01.2022) wherein after relying on the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Thana Singh vs. Central Bureau of

Narcotics passed in Civil Appeal No.1640/2010 dated 30.08.2010 held that if the period of custody undergone by the accused is more than 50% of the sentence i.e. awarded, then the application for suspension of sentence may be considered on the said ground. He has further also placed reliance on the recent judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Mohammad Muslim @ Hussain vs. State (NCT of Delhi) [Criminal Appeal No. 943/2023, dtd. 28.03.2023], wherein, the Apex Court has taken into consideration the earlier judgments passed by the Apex Court in the case of State of M.P. vs. Kajad (2001) 7 SCC 673 and also the judgment passed in the case of Union of India vs. Ratan Malik (2009) 2 SCC 624 and thereafter enlarged the accused on bail on completion of 50% of the actual jail sentence. He further relied on the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Sabir Vs. State of MP and Anor reported in 2023 SAR (Cri) 257, where the jail sentence of the

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SOURABH YADAV Signing time: 20/04/2023 10:11:17 AM

appellant was suspended and he was released on bail on the ground that he has already undergone five years and two months of custody under trial prisoner and as a convict.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent supported the order of conviction and sentence and submitted that the prosecution has made recovery of the contraband from the joint possession of the accused persons and the quantity of the seized contraband is more than commercial quantity and therefore, there would be presumption of knowledge of the contraband being carried by the other co-accused. He also placed reliance on an order passed by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Ajay Kumar Singh @ Pappu arising out of SLP (Cri.) No.2351/2023, whereby, the order passed by the High Court suspending the jail sentence of the accused has been set aside in view of the provisions of section 37 of the NDPS Act. The order passed by the Apex Court in the case of Moh.Muslim (supra) is in respect of under trial prisoners and not in the case of convicts, therefore, would not apply to a convict in appeal.

7. In this regard, after hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant was sitting on the back and the bag with contraband was being carried by co-accused and the prosecution case failed to prove the knowledge of carrying the contraband by the co-accused, as held by the Apex Court in the case of Sorabhkhan (supra) and in the case of Avtar

Singh (supra) that the person merely sitting on the back in absence of proof of knowledge could not be presumed to be in possession of goods.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SOURABH YADAV Signing time: 20/04/2023 10:11:17 AM

8. Apart from merits, the appellant has already undergone jail sentence of five years eight months the Apex Court in the case of Moh. Muslim (supra) has observed after considering the judgment passed in the case of Union of India Vs. Ratan reported in (2009) 2 SCC 624 that the courts have to be sensitive in respect of weakest economic strate, immediate loss of livelihood and in several cases, scattering of families as well as loss of family bonds and alienation from society because in the event of acquittal, the lost to the accused is irreparable.

9. Accordingly , I.A No.1372 of 2023 filed on behalf of appellant is allowed. The appellant be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with one solvent surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 28.08.2023 and thereafter, on such other subsequent dates as may be fixed in that behalf.

(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE

Sourabh

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SOURABH YADAV Signing time: 20/04/2023 10:11:17 AM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter