Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5881 MP
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
ON THE 11 th OF APRIL, 2023
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1468 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
RAJESH @ RAJENDRA S/O DARIYAV SINGH, AGED
ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOR VILL.
RAJAVATA, P.S. MO. BADODIYA, DISTRICT SHAJAPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(BY MS. NIVEDITA SHARMA-ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE
STATION MO. BADODIYA DISTRICT SHAJAPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY MS. BHAGYASHREE GUPTA-G.A. )
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
JUDGMENT
This is appeal u/S 374 of the Cr.P.C. arising out of judgment of conviction
and sentence dated 14.1.2023 passed by Special Judge, district Shajapur in Special
case No.600448/2016 whereby the appellant has been convicted under section
323 IPC and sentenced to undergo 3 months RI with fine of Rs.1000/- with
default stipulation.
As per prosecution case, on 10.10.2016, the appellant abused the
complainant and assaulted him by wooden stick due to which complainant
sustained injuries. FIR was lodged on 11.10.2016 and the case was registered
under sections 294, 323, 506(II) IPC and section 3(1)(R), 3(2)(V-a) of SC & ST
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA CHANDRASHEKHAR KOUSHAL Signing time: 11-Apr-23 6:03:25 PM
Act. The trial court acquitted the appellant from all the charges except the charge
under section 323 IPC.
Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has already undergone
jail sentence of 3 days and and the incident had taken place in the year 2016. The
appellat was on bail during trial and appeal did not misuse the liberty. He
maintained good record and relation with the complainant. No purpose would be
served in sending the appellant in jail after such long period. Therefore, the
appellant may be sentenced to the period already undergone and fine amount may
be increased which may be directed to be paid to the complainant.
Counsel for State do not dispute the aforesaid facts.
After hearing learned counsel for parties and taking into consideration the
short jail sentence of the appellant and the period already undergone by him, I am
of the opinion that a case is made out for sentencing the appellant to the period
already undergone with enhancement of fine amount. Further the incident had
taken place in the year 2016 and the appellant has maintained good record and did
not misuse the liberty. No purpose would be served in keeping the appeal pending
and sending the appellant in jail after such a long period. Therefore, the appeal is
partly allowed. The conviction is maintained. The jail sentence of the appellant is
reduced to the period already undergone by him and the fine amount is enchnaced
from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.5,000/- which shall be paid by the appellant within a period
of one month from today. Out of the said amount, Rs.4,500/- shall be paid by the
trial court to the complainant-Prakash. The bail bonds of the appellant shall be
discharged after deposit of the fine amount. In case if the appellant fails to deposit
the fine amount within the aforesaid period, the appellant shall undergo the
remaining jail sentence as per the order of trial court.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA CHANDRASHEKHAR KOUSHAL Signing time: 11-Apr-23 6:03:25 PM
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE
MK
Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA CHANDRASHEKHAR KOUSHAL Signing time: 11-Apr-23 6:03:25 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!