Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5637 MP
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 6 th OF APRIL, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 11485 of 2018
BETWEEN:-
KRISHNA KUMAR CHOUBEY S/O LATE BIHARI LAL
CHOUBEY OCCUPATION: STATE GOVT. SERVANT,
SAMYAPAL (TIME KEEPER) BEFORE R/3, R/O H.NO. 490,
KAMANIYA GATE, BADA MAIDAN, BEHIND BADKU
HALWAI, DISTT. JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI VIVEK SHUKLA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR.
SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEPARTMENT OF
NARMADA GHATI DEVELOPMENT VALLABH
BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, M.P.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. COMMISSIONER (FINANCE) KOSH AVEM LEKHA
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. CHIEF ENGINEER, UPPER NARMADA ZONE
BARGI HILLS JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DAI TAAT NAHAR,
SAMBHAG KRAMANK- 1, KATNI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI SOURABH SONI - PANEL LAWYER)
Signature Not Verified
SAN This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
Digitally signed by TULSA SINGH
Date: 2023.04.06 19:33:07 IST
following:
ORDER
Shri Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not claiming parity with the judgment of Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of A.L. Thakur and others Vs. The State of M.P. and others (W.P. No.16054/2003) (Annexure-P/4), however, claiming parity with the order (Annexure-P/6) issued in favour of six other persons who were also working as Time Keeper. Petitioner's contention is that since he was working as Time Keeper, therefore, respondents may be directed to decide his case on the basis of parity with other persons in whose favour order dated 19/07/2017 (Annexure-P/5) is passed by the Chief Engineer, Upper Narmada Zone, Jabalpur.
Without commenting on merits this petition can be disposed of that in case petitioner files a fresh representation to the Chief Engineer, Upper Narmada Zone, Jabalpur, then the said authority shall consider the case of the petitioner and if it is found to be at par with Shri Balmukund Dubey and others in whose favour order dated 19/7/2017 is issued, then shall decide the representation in accordance with law.
Let representation be made along with copy of the writ petition and the order being passed today within a period within 15 days from today which shall be decided by the concerned Chief Engineer within further period of 60 days through speaking order.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
In above terms, this petition is disposed of.
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by TULSA SINGH Date: 2023.04.06 19:33:07 IST
(VIVEK AGARWAL)
JUDGE ts
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by TULSA SINGH Date: 2023.04.06 19:33:07 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!