Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14143 MP
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI
ON THE 2nd OF NOVEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 23161 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1. SUNIL KUMAR HARIJAN S/O RAJBHOR
HARIJAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: BY CONSTABLE ROLL NO. 772107
GD 6TH BN SAF JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. YASHPAL DEHARIYA S/O MUNIRAM DEHARIYA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
CONSTABLE ROLL NO.807487 GD 8TH BN SAF
CHHINDWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. AMAR BRAMHWANSHI S/O MUNNA LAL, AGED
ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE
ROLL NO.521305 GD 8TH BN SAF CHHINDWARA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. DURGESH DEHARIYA S/O KHOOBCHAND
DEHARIYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE ROLL NO.575270 GD
8TH BN SAF CHHINDWARA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
5. YOGENDRA DEHARIYA S/O SITARAM
DEHARIYA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE ROLL NO.808014 GD
6TH BN SAF JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. UMASHANKAR BUDDHA S/O RAMLAL BUDDHA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
CONSTABLE ROLL NO.714597 GD 6TH BN SAF
JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. DINESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/O BHOOPAT
SINGH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
CONSTABLE ROLL NO.744075 GD 6TH BN SAF
JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. GYANENDRA KUMAR CHANDRAWANSHI S/O
RAM KAILASH CHANDRAVANSHI, AGED
ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE
ROLL NO.504113 GD 6TH BN SAF JABALPUR
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: ASTHA SEN
Signing time: 11/3/2022
4:25:07 PM
2
(MADHYA PRADESH)
9. LOVE KUMAR MORLE S/O GOPAL PRASAD
MORLE, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
CONSTABLE ROLL NO.5254215 GD 23RD BN SAF
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. PANKAJ BARDE S/O SHRIRAM BARDE, AGED
ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE
ROLL NO.522786 GD 8TH BN SAF CHHINDWARA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
11. AKASH NAYAK S/O RAMBHUVAN, AGED ABOUT
3 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE ROLL
NO.79041 GD 6TH BN SAF JABALPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
12. GOVIND PRASAD S/O BHAGWAN DAS, AGED
ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONSTABLE
ROLL NO.579988 GD 6TH BN SAF JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
13. SANJEEV JHAWARE S/O ASHOK JHAWARE,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
CONSTABLE ROLL NO.656784 GD 23RD BN SAF
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI PAWAN KUMAR SINGH SENGAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT
MANTRALAYA VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE DIRECTOR GENRAL OF POLICE POLICE
HEAD QUARTER S JAHANGIRABAD (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF
POLICE (SELECTION) P.H.Q. JAHANGIRABAD
BHOPAL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR PANDEY, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: ASTHA SEN
Signing time: 11/3/2022
4:25:07 PM
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a representation of the subject matter of this petition is pending before the respondents No.1, 2 and 3. He has also drawn attention of this Court to Annexure-P/3 at page No.19 which is the order passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.7663/2021 (Praveen Kumar Kurmi vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others) where, the Supreme Court, in a case of similarly situated candidates had preferred an appeal before the Supreme Court which held that a person from the reserved category, though falling within the eligibility of the general seat on account of his high merit, should not be placed to a disadvantageous position as regard the service and post viz-a-viz a candidate who may be placed below him.
Shri Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned Government Advocate while taking this Court to paragraph 4 of the writ petition submits that the cause suffers from delay and laches inasmuch as, after decision in Civil Appeal No.7663/2021 (Praveen Kumar Kurmi vs. The State of M.P. and Ors.), the petitioners have filed this petition, therefore, there is a futile attempt by the petitioners to revive a stale claim.
Under the circumstances, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No. 2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioners as well as objection raised by the respondents, within a period of 60 days in light
of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.7663/2021 and also in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ritesh R. Sah vs. Dr. Y.L. Yamul and Others (1996) 3 SCC 253 . If the case of the petitioners is similar to the case of the appellants in Civil Appeal No.7663/2021, then similar benefits be extended to the petitioners herein.
With the aforesaid, the petition is finally disposed of. Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASTHA SEN Signing time: 11/3/2022 4:25:07 PM
The Court makes it clear that it has not passed any observations on the merits of the case and the said representation be decided strictly in accordance with law uninfluenced by the observations of this Court.
Certified copy, as per rules.
(MANINDER S. BHATTI) JUDGE Astha
Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASTHA SEN Signing time: 11/3/2022 4:25:07 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!