Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4539 MP
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2022
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-16015-2022 Jhadu @ Vijay Singh Vs. State of MP
Gwalior, Dated: 30.03.2022
Shri Ravi Dwivedi, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri A.K. Nirankari, Counsel for the State.
Case Diary is not available.
This second application under Section 439 of CrPC has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 28.12.2021 in connection
with Crime No.112/2021 registered at Police Station Aswar, Tahsil
Lahar Distt. Bhind for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471,
120-B of IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that first bail
application was dismissed by a detailed order dated 27.01.2022
passed in M.Cr.C. No.4215/2022, therefore, this application may be
considered and decided in the light of the facts mentioned in the said
order. It is submitted that according to the prosecution case, the
complainant was interested in getting married and accordingly, the
applicant and the co-accused Prathvi introduced him with a girl
namely Poonam and charged Rs.45,000/-. After the marriage of the
complainant took place with the said girl, husband of the girl came
forward and claimed that the correct name of so called girl is
Shamina Begam and she is already married. It is submitted that the
applicant is ready and willing to deposit an amount of Rs.50,000/-
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-16015-2022 Jhadu @ Vijay Singh Vs. State of MP
without any prejudice to his defence. He is already in jail for the last
three months. The Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and
there is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the
prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State.
In the light of the allegations made against the applicant as
well as considering the period of detention, coupled with the
concessional statement made by the counsel for the applicant, the
application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on
bail on depositing an amount of Rs.50,000/- without any prejudice
to his defence and on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like amount
to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear
before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
It is directed that the amount of Rs.45,000/- shall be released in
favour of the complainant on his furnishing a solvent surety to the
satisfaction of the concerning Court. The complainant shall also
furnish an undertaking that in case, if the applicant is acquitted, then
he shall refund the amount immediately.
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-16015-2022 Jhadu @ Vijay Singh Vs. State of MP
The deposit of amount of Rs.50,000/- shall be a condition
precedent to release the applicant on bail.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Abhi ABHISHEK CHATURVEDI 2022.03.31 18:48:04 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!