Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashok Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 3995 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3995 MP
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Ashok Kumar Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 March, 2022
Author: Anand Pathak
         THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                           1                        M.Cr.C.No.3697/2020


       Ashok Kumar Gupta & Anr. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.

Gwalior Bench Dated; 23.03.2022

      Shri Dinesh Savita, learned counsel for the petitioners.

      Shri Kuldeep Singh, learned PP for respondent No.1/State.

None for respondent No.2.

With consent heard finally.

The present petition has been preferred by the petitioners under

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking

quashment of FIR registered at Crime No.329/2019 at Police Station

Jhansi Road, Gwalior for the offence under Section 420 of IPC on the

basis of compromise.

It is the submission of counsel for the parties that both the

parties want to settle the matter and they want to bury the dispute once

and for all. They intend to enter into the compromise therefore,

applications under Sections 320(1) and 320(2) of Cr.P.C. by way of

I.A. No.769/2020 and I.A.No.770/2020 have been preferred by the

parties. Parties fairly submit that they want to give peace a chance and

for that they want to settle their dispute inter se. Under the direction of

this Court, the factum of compromise entered into between the parties

has been verified by the Principal Registrar of this Court and

according to the said report, parties settled the matter and intended to

compromise the matter. In pursuance to the direction of this Court,

Rs.25,000/- has already been deposited by the petitioners in favour of THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Army Central Welfare Fund, receipt of which is attached.

Parties intended to serve the society in meaningful manner to purge their

guilt and to reform themselves from their inner soul, therefore, expressed their

desire to perform community service by way of deposit to serve National/Social

cause. .

A Lean Compromise is better than a Fat Law Suit, instant

efforts of the parties indicate the same. It is expected that their bona

fide gestures would continue.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in catena of judgments Jagdish

Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another, AIR 2008 SC

1968, Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 2008 SC

1969, Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another, (2011) 10 SCC 705, Narinder

Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466, B.S. Joshi

and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675,

Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Parbatbhai

Ahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others Vs. State

of Gujarat and another, (2017) 9 SCC 641, laid down that even in

non-compoundable cases on the basis of compromise, criminal

proceedings can be quashed so that valuable time of the court can be

saved and utilized in other material cases.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into

account the law laid down by the Apex Court, in the opinion of this

Court, continuance of trial in such matter will be a futile exercise

which will serve no purpose. Further the ingredients are mainly under THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Section 420 of IPC, therefore, permission to compound the offence is

accorded. Under such a situation, section 482 Cr.P.C. can be justifiably

invoked to prevent abuse of the process of law and wasteful exercise

by the courts below.

To preserve the resources and bonhomie created between the

parties arises out of settlement, in the interest of justice, applications

for compounding the offence vide I.A.No.769/2020 and

I.A.No.770/2020 are allowed because no fruitful purpose would be

served in continuation of trial. Thus, parties are permitted to

compound the offence.

Resultantly, the petition is allowed. FIR registered at Crime

No.329/2019 at Police Station Jhansi Road, Gwalior for the offence

under Section 420 of IPC and subsequent proceedings thereto stand

quashed against the petitioners.

Principal Registrar of this Court is directed to send a copy of

this order to the Chief of Defence Staff/Ex-officio Secretary to the

Department of Military Affairs in Ministry of Defence, North

Block New Delhi for information purpose about the thoughtfulness of

petitioners towards National Cause.

Petition stands allowed and disposed of in above terms.


                                                        (Anand Pathak)
Anil*                                                       Judge
          ANIL KUMAR
          CHAURASIYA
          2022.03.25
          12:04:55 -07'00'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter