Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3425 MP
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.12054/2022
(SMT. GEETA AGARWAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Gwalior, Dated : 10/03/2022
Shri Rohit Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri C.P.Singh, learned counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
This third repeat application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has
been filed for grant of bail. Second bail application of the applicant
was dismissed by order dated 14/01/2022 passed in MCRC
No.543/2022.
The applicant has been arrested on 21/09/2021 in connection
with Crime No.68/2021 registered at Police Station Padav, District
Gwalior for offence under Sections 406 and 420/34 of IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according
to the prosecution case, the husband of the applicant had entered into
an agreement to sell a piece of land to the complainant for a
consideration amount of Rs.21,00,000/-. The applicant and her
daughter had also jointly signed the said agreement to sell being the
co-owner and an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- was received by cheque
and it was agreed that the remaining amount of Rs.6,00,000/- shall be
payable within a period of one year. But thereafter, it appears that the
husband of the applicant sold the same land to one Gyan Singh and
Laxman Singh for a consideration amount of Rs.13,17,000/- and
although, the applicant had stood as a witness to the said sell deed
2
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.12054/2022
(SMT. GEETA AGARWAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
but she had acted on the instruction of her husband without realizing
the consequences of the same. In order to show her bonafide she is
ready and willing to deposit an amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, which shall
be without any prejudice to her defence. She is in jail from
21/09/2021
and the Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and
there is no possibility of her absconding or tampering with the
prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State.
In view of the fact that the applicant is a lady and in order to
show her bonafide, she is ready and willing to deposit an amount of
Rs.15,00,000/- without any prejudice to her defence, therefore,
without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is
allowed. It is directed that on depositing an amount of
Rs.15,00,000/- without prejudice to her defence, the applicant be
released on bail and on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like amount
to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear
before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
The deposit of an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- shall be
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.12054/2022 (SMT. GEETA AGARWAL VS. STATE OF M.P.)
condition precedent for release of the applicant. The amount so
deposited by the applicant can be paid to the complainant on
submitting an undertaking that in case, if the trial results in
acquittal of the applicant, then he shall immediately refund the
amount. The withdrawal of the amount by the complainant
would be without any prejudice to his claim, if any civil suit is
filed or pending.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
Pj'S/- Judge
Digitally signed by
PRINCEE BARAIYA
Date: 2022.03.10
16:46:17 -08'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!