Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brajesh Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 2928 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2928 MP
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Brajesh Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 March, 2022
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
                          1
          THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                       MCRC No. 9087/2022
          (BRAJESH AHIRWAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF M.P.)

Gwalior, Dated : 02/03/2022

      Shri Navnidhi Parharya, Counsel for applicants.

      Shri C.P. Singh, Counsel for State.

      Case diary is available.

      In compliance of order dated 28.02.2022, Shri Yogendra

Parmar, the Investigating Officer posted at Police Station Murwas,

District Vidisha is present in person.

      This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for

grant of bail.

      The applicants have been arrested on 10.01.2022 in connection

with Crime No.169/2021 registered by Police Station - Murwas,

District Vidisha for offence punishable under Sections 305, 34 of IPC.

      On 21.02.2022, it was noticed that the Police has also recorded

the statements of some witnesses who have stated that they had seen

the applicants following the deceased and thereafter her dead-body

was found, and accordingly, the State Counsel was directed to clarify

that on one hand the prosecution has collected the evidence of last

seen together and on the other hand, prosecution is relying on the

motive to say that it is case under Section 305 of IPC.

      It is submitted by Shri Parmar that on 23.06.2021, the

statements of two minor girls Neelam and Poonam were recorded

during marg enquiry who have stated that the deceased had gone to

answer the call of nature and thereafter she did not return back,
                           2
          THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                      MCRC No. 9087/2022
         (BRAJESH AHIRWAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF M.P.)

however, their statements under Section 161 of Cr.P.C were recorded

on 28.08.2021 and in those statements, the witnesses Poonam and

Neelam stated that they had seen the applicants following the

deceased. It is further submitted that thereafter further investigation

was conducted under the orders of superior authorities and the

supplementary statements of Anita Bai, Halkeram, Sambhu Singh and

Pratap were recorded. It is submitted that after completing the

investigation, he came to a conclusion that infact an offence under

Section 305, 34 of IPC is made out and not under Section 302 of IPC.

It is further submitted by Shri Parmar that the statements of Poonam

and Neelam which were recorded on 28.08.2021 have also been filed

along-with the charge-sheet. Therefore, the Trial Court would be free

to consider the statements of Poonam and Neelam dated 28.08.2021

while framing the charges.

      It is submitted by Counsel for the applicants that according to

the prosecution case, the applicants were harassing the deceased, and

therefore, she committed suicide. No specific reason for harassment

has been pointed out except that they had enmity as the father of

deceased was implicated in a murder case. It is further submitted that

the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no

possibility of their absconding or tampering with prosecution case.

      Per contra, the application is opposed by the Counsel for the

respondent/State.

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No. 9087/2022 (BRAJESH AHIRWAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF M.P.)

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

In view of the fact that the Police has filed the charge-sheet for

offence under Section 305, 34 of IPC, and without commenting on the

merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the

applicants be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac Only) each with one surety

each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial

Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given

by the concerned Court.

This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in

case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the

case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021

in Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of

bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rule.

(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge

Aman AMAN TIWARI 2022.03.02 18:01:16 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter