Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 262 MP
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
CRA-7733-2021
Kuwar Pal Vs. State of MP and anr.
Gwalior, Dated : 05.01.2022
Shri Brajesh Kumar Tyagi, Counsel for the appellant.
Shri APS Tomar, Counsel for the respondent No. 1/State.
None for the respondent No. 2/complainant.
It is submitted by the counsel for the State that the complainant
has been informed about the pendency of this appeal as required under
Section 15-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention
of Atrocities) Act (in short "Act of 1989").
Case diary is available.
This third criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14-A (2)
of the Act of 1989 against the order dated 10.05.2021 passed by Special
Judge (Atrocities), Ashoknagar, rejecting the bail application.
The appellant has been arrested on 05.12.2020 in connection with
Crime No.605/2020 registered by Police Station Isagarh Distt.
Ashoknagar for offence punishable under Sections 376, 341, 506 of IPC
and Sections 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(2)(va) of the Act of 1989 and Section 3/4 of
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short
"POCSO Act")
It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant that he has filed
the present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Act of 1989, but
in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court, the
application under Section 439 of CrPC would be maintainable as an
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH CRA-7733-2021 Kuwar Pal Vs. State of MP and anr.
offence under POCSO Act has also been registered. It is submitted that
either he may be granted a week's time to file a necessary application
for conversion of this appeal into an application under Section 439 of
CrPC or his verbal prayer may be accepted for the same.
Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the
applicant.
In view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court
at Principal Seat, Jabalpur by order dated 22.04.2021 passed in Cr.A.
No.5189/2020 (Pramod Yadav Vs. State of M.P.), wherein it has been
held that where the offences under the Act of 1989 as well as the
POCSO Act have been registered, then the trial shall be conducted as
per provisions of POCSO Act, therefore, this Criminal Appeal filed
under Section 14-A(2) of the Act of 1989 is not maintainable and in
fact, the application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C should have been filed.
Prayer for conversion is based on the judgment passed by the
Division Bench of this Court in the case of Pramod Yadav (supra),
accordingly, verbal prayer is allowed.
The Office is directed to register this case as Miscellaneous
Criminal Case under Section 439 of CrPC.
With aforesaid observations, this criminal appeal is finally
disposed of.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Abhi ABHISHEK CHATURVEDI 2022.01.06 16:53:44 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!