Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 210 MP
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR
ARBITRATION APPEAL 27/2015
NO.
Parties Name PROJECT DIRECTOR
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
VS.
SANJAY KUMAR
AND OTHERS
Bench Constituted Single Bench
Judgment delivered By HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT
Whether approved for
reporting
Name of counsel for parties For petitioner: Shri K. N. Pethia, Advocate.
For Respondents : Shri H. K. Upadhyay, Advocate .
Law laid down Significant paragraph number
(O R D E R ) 05/01/2022
Appellant has filed this appeal under section 37(1)(b) of
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to
as the Act of 1996) challenging order dated 24.02.2015
passed in M.J.C No.7/2013 by First Additional District Judge,
Narsinghpur allowing application file by respondents under
section 34 of the Act of 1996, whereby order dated 16.5.2011
passed by Commissioner/Arbitrator Jabalpur Division, Jabalpur in
Case No.579A/82/07-08 was rejected.
2. Award was passed in Revenue Case No.29A/82/04-05 dated
31.8.2007 by competent authority for acquisition of land
belonging to respondents for construction of N.H-26.
3. Learned counsel for respondents submitted that Arbitration
Appeal No.38/2015, filed before High Court, was dismissed by
judgment dated 27.11.2019. In said Arbitration Appeal same
award, i.e. dated 31.8.2007 for acquisition of land in respect of
N.H-26 was under consideration. It is submitted that present case
is covered by said judgment. Learned counsel for respondents
placed on record judgment dated 27.11.2019 passed in A.A
No.38/2015.
4. Considered order dated 27.11.2019 passed by this Court in
AA No.38/2015 which was dismissed on ground that award dated
31.8.2007 was not challenged by appellant before
Commissioner/Arbitrator under Section 3(g)(v) of the National
Highways Act, 1956. Respondents had filed an appeal before
Arbitrator/Commissioner. Arbitrator/Commissioner rejected the
claim and thereafter application was preferred under Section 34A
of the Act of 1996. Against said order this Arbitration Appeal has
been filed. Since original award was not challenged by the
appellant and appeal has been filed challenging quantum of
award and grounds available under section 34 of the Act of 1996,
was not raised, learned Single Judge had dismissed Arbitration
Appeal.
5. In this Arbitration Appeal order dated 24.2.2015 passed by
Additional District Judge is under challenge but no appeal or cross
appeal was preferred by appellant against award dated
31.8.2007 passed in Land Acquisition Case. Arbitration appeal is
filed only against valuation of property. Grounds under section
34 of the Act of 1996, is not raised by appellant.
6. Grounds and facts in this Arbitration Appeal are similar to
that of Arbitration Appeal No.38/2015.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
case, since appellant has not preferred any appeal against award
dated 31.8.2007 before Arbitrator/Commissioner and none of the
grounds of section 34 of the Act of 1996, is available to the
appellant, therefore, Arbitration Appeal is dismissed.
(VISHAL DHAGAT) JUDGE mms
Digitally signed by MONSI M SIMON Date: 2022.01.06 15:03:17 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!