Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Sardarmal Samrathmal Kothari vs Commissioner Commercial Tax ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 1613 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1613 MP
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
M/S Sardarmal Samrathmal Kothari vs Commissioner Commercial Tax ... on 4 February, 2022
Author: Vivek Rusia
                          1                          VATA No.1/2022


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT
                          INDORE
                               BEFORE
                HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA
                                  &
          HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)

                    ON THE 4st OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                           VATA No.1/2022

    Between:-
    M/S SARDARMAL SAMRATHMAL KOTHARI THROUGH PROPRIETOR
    MR. VIJAY KOTHARI, R/O CHIMANGANJ MANDI (MADHYA
    PRADESH)
                                                       .....APPELLANT
    (BY SHRI ADITYA GOYAL, ADVOCATE )

B

    AND

    COMMISSIONER    COMMERCIAL    TAX   MADHYA              PRADESH
    COMMISSIONER INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
                                                    .....RESPONDENT
    (BY SHRI SHREY RAJ SAXENA, ADVOCATE )
                  (Heard through Video Conferencing)
        This appeal coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SHRI

JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA passed the following:

                              JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed under Section 13 of the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Khhetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 read with Section 53 of the M.P. Vat Act, 2002 against order dated 24.9.2021 by the M.P. Commercial Tax Appellate Board, Bhopal Bench at Indore in case No.A/101/CTB/IND/17(Praveshkar).

The appellant has not proposed any substantial question of law involve in this appeal on ground No.3.1.

After hearing the parties and on the basis of law laid down by

the Apex Court in the case of Shyam Deo Pandey Vs. State of Bihar (1971) 1 SCC 855 and Savita Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), 2019 10 SCC 29.We find a substantial question of law involved in this case:-

"(1)whether the Appellate Board has committed error of law while deciding the appeal without summoning the record from the subordinate Authority".

Heard.

Although the appellant has assailed the impugned order dated 24.9.2021 on merit but learned counsel has drawn attention of this Court to Paragragh 7 of the judgment in which the Board has held that the Appeal is being consider on the basis of averments made in the appeal as the records of the Assessment Authority as well as the Appellate Authority are not available.

The Apex Court in case of Shyam Deo Pandey (supra) has held that the record is necessary to enable the Board to adjudicate upon the correctness of the impugned order. The Apex Court also in the case of Savita (supra) has set aside the impugned order passed by the High Court and remanded the matter back to the High Court for hearing of the appeals afresh after reconstruction of the record of the trial Court.

Therefore, the records of the subordinate Court/Authority/Tribunal are liable to be examined while deciding the validity of correctness of impugned order/judgment. Hence, we answer the question of law in favour of the assesses and remand this matter.

Vide order dated 28.1.2022, this Court had directed Shri Shrey Raj Saxena, learned Dy. Advocate General to verify whether the appeal was decided by the Board without the record.

Shri Saxena, confirms that facts stated in paragraph 7 of the order dated 24.9.2021 passed by the Commissioner Commercial Tax

Appellate Board, Bhopal (Bench at Indore) are correct.

We are of the considered opinion that while deciding the appeal by the Appellate Board, the record ought to be there for perusal of the Presiding Officer/Judge as well as by the counsel for the parties.This Appeal is liable to be decided after appreciating the material available on record and not only on the basis of pleadings of the memo of appeal. Therefore, the record of Subordinate Assessing Authority as well as the Appellate Authority are necessary before the higher forum/Court.

Hence, without entering into the merits of the matter as well as on other question of laws, we remand the matter back to the Appellate Board for fresh adjudication after summoning the record of Appeal No.A/101/CTB/IND/17(Praveshkar) and record from the Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax as well as the Appellate Authority Appellate Board Bhopal (Bench at Indore) without being influenced by the finding and final outcome of order dated 24.9.2021..

The appeal is accordingly, disposed of.

        (VIVEK RUSIA)                  (RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA))
             JUDGE                                    JUDGE


             Digitally signed by
             REENA PARTHO
das          SARKAR
             Date: 2022.02.07
             10:56:28 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter