Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16157 MP
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
CRA No. 1297 of 2018
(NANA ALIAS AJAY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Dated : 06-12-2022
Shri Nilesh Dave, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Sudhanshu Vyas Pl appearing on behalf of Advocate
General/State.
Heard on I.A. No.8902/2022, first application under Section 389 (1) of
Cr.P.C for suspension of sentence and grant of bail moved on behalf of
appellant Nana @ Ajay.
The appellant has been convicted for offence punishable under Section
363, 366, 344 of IPC and under Section 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act, and sentenced
to undergo 03, 05, 01 and 10 years respectively with fine of Rs. 500, 1000/-,
500/- and 2000/- respectively with default stipulations.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is not seeking bail on
merit but on the ground that the appellant has completed more than half of the
sentence and out of the 10 years he has completed 8 years and 03 months of his
jail incarceration period. There are fair chances of success in the appeal and
there is no likelihood of disposal of appeal in near future. Under these
circumstances, counsel prays for suspension of remaining jail sentence of
appellant and grant of bail.
Learned Government Advocate for the respondent / State opposes the
application by submitting that the applicant is convicted under the provisions of POCSO Act and hence, he is not entitled for any relief. Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN AMIT KUMAR
Keeping in view the fact that the appellant is in custody for more than 8 Date: 2022.12.07 18:14:22 IST
years and 3 months i.e. more than half of the sentence, so also in light of order
passed by Division Bench of this Court in Cr.A. No.1167/2014, in which this Court has granted suspension of sentence as the appellant therein was in custody for more than 10 years without remission by relying upon a judgment delivered in the case of Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing under trial Prisoners v/s Union of India & Others reported in (1994) 6 SCC 731, I deem it proper to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the appellant.
Accordingly, I.A. No.8902/2022 is allowed and it is directed that subject to depositing the fine amount and on furnishing personal bond by appellant in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with a
solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his regular appearance before this Court, the execution of custodial part of the sentence imposed against the appellant shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.
Appellant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his presence before the Registry of this Court on 11.01.2023 and on all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Registry in this regard.
This is an admitted appeal.
List the appeal in due course for final hearing. Certified copy, as per Rules.
(RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)) JUDGE
amit Signature Not Verified VerifiedDigitally Digitally signed by SAN AMIT KUMAR Date: 2022.12.07 18:14:22 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!