Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jahar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 5459 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5459 MP
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Jahar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 April, 2022
Author: Dinesh Kumar Paliwal
                                                                             1
                                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                                  AT JABALPUR
                                                                     CRA No. 7438 of 2021
                                                          (JAHAR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

                                       Dated : 13-04-2022
                                             Shri Laxmi Narayan Sakle, learned counsel for the appellants.

                                             Shri Teekaram Kurmi, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

Record of the Trial Court has been received.

Heard on admission.

The appeal is admitted for final hearing.

Also Heard on I.A.No.21827/2021, application under Section 389(1) of

Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to appellant No.2 Maniram.

The appellants have been convicted under Sections 304-B and 498-A of IPC and have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 year, and R.I. for 2 years and fine of Rs. 5000/- respectively with default stipulation by the Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur (M.P.) vide judgment dated 24.11.2021 passed in ST No. 47/2017 (State of MP Vs. Jahar and another) Learned counsel for the appellant No. 2 submitted that in this case, on 19.07.2016 deceased/Vimlesh consumed hair dye in her matrimonial house, she was taken to the District Hospital Chhatarpur where she died on 02.08.2016. After

death, marg was registered under Section 174 of Cr.P.C. and almost after a period of six months FIR Exhibit P-17 was registered on 17.02.2017. Learned counsel for the appellant No.2 has further contended that in this period no report was made by the parents of the deceased/Vimlesh. In the meantime a Panchayat was organized by Lakhan Kushwaha (PW-2) father of deceased but when in Panchayat matter could not be settled, then on the basis of after thought statement FIR was registered. Learned counsel for the appellant No.2 has taken me to Para No. 12, 13 and 17 of the evidence of Lakhan Kushwaha (PW-2) father of deceased in which he has stated that at the time of marg inquiry he did not make any statement about demand of dowry and cruelty caused with deceased by the appellant No.2/Maniram. In Para 13 (PW-2) has admitted that appellants accused are well to Signature Not Verified SAN do and their financial condition is better than his. He further admitted that appellant No. 2 Maniram used to sell the vegetables. He has further admitted that Digitally signed by LALIT SINGH RANA Date: 2022.04.13 17:15:36 IST

deceased/Vimlesh was comfortable in her matrimonial house. Learned counsel for the appellant No.2 further submitted that no specific allegations have been made against the appellant No.2 about demand of dowry and causing cruelty with deceased. Appellant No.2 Maniram is 55 years old father-in-law of

deceased/Vimlesh. Therefore, he may be released on bail till final disposal of the appeal.

O n the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State has opposed suspension of execution of jail sentence and grant of bail.

In this case, FIR has been registered almost after six months of the incident. I have gone through the paras 12, 13 and 17 of the evidence of Lakhan Kushwaha (PW-2). Thus, having gone through the evidence of other witnesses also and taking into consideration the facts that specific allegations and evidence is against the husband. I am inclined to release the appellant No.2 Maniram on bail till further orders.

Accordingly, aforesaid I.A.No.21827/2021 is allowed. The execution of jail sentence of appellant No.2-Maniram is hereby suspended subject to depositing the fine amount, (if not already deposited). It is directed that the appellant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond to a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with a further direction to appear before the trial Court on 13.09.2022 and also on all such other dates, as may be fixed by the trial Court in this regard during the pendency of this appeal.

List the case for final hearing in due course as per listing policy. Certified copy as per rules.

(DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL) JUDGE

L.R.

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by LALIT SINGH RANA Date: 2022.04.13 17:15:36 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter