Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arun Mr vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 1125 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1125 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Arun Mr vs State Of Kerala on 3 February, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
                                                             2026:KER:9350


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

      TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026/14TH MAGHA, 1947

                      BAIL APPL. NO. 422 OF 2026

     CRIME NO.702/2025 OF MALAMPUZHA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD

 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC NO.5410 OF 2025 OF ASSISTANT

            SESSIONS COURT/ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD

PETITIONER/ACCUSED 3:

            RATHUL DAS K.H
            AGED 28 YEARS, S/O HARIDAS,
            KOYITHARA HOUSE, VTC: MALAMPUZHA - I, ANAIKKAL P.O.,
            PALAKKAD, PIN - 678651

            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.ATHUL KRISHNA A.
            SHRI.VARUN JACOB




RESPONDENT/STATE/COMPLAINANT:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
            PIN - 682031

            BY ADV.
            SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP


     THIS   BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
03.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026
                                       2
                                                              2026:KER:9350


                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                    PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

          TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026/14TH MAGHA, 1947

                        BAIL APPL. NO. 421 OF 2026

         CRIME NO.702/2025 OF MALAMPUZHA POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMC NO.5410 OF 2025 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS

                   COURT/ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD


PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2:

     1      ARUN MR
            AGED 33 YEARS, S/O ROY,
            MALAYIL VEEDU, ANAIKKAL P.O., MALAMPUZHA - I,
            PALAKKAD, PIN - 678651

     2      MIDUNRAJ R.
            AGED 25 YEARS, S/O RAJEEV,
            KOCHITHODU HOUSE,MALAMPUZHA - I, PALAKKAD,
            PIN - 678651

            BY ADVS.
            SHRI.SARATH M.S.
            SHRI.GOKUL DEVIS




RESPONDENT/STATE/COMPLAINANT:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY HE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
            PIN - 682031

            BY ADV.
            SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PP


     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.02.2026,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026
                                     3
                                                             2026:KER:9350


                                ORDER

These applications are filed under Section 482 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short,

BNSS), seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. Since the crime number and subject

matter of the dispute in both the cases are one and the

same, I am disposing these bail applications by a common

order.

3. The applicant in Bail Appl. No.422 of 2026

is the accused No.3 and the applicants in Bail Appl. No.421

of 2026 are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.702/2025

of Malampuzha Police Station, Palakkad District. The

offences alleged are punishable under Sections 189(2),

191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 118(2) read with

Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case in both the cases, in

short, is that on 21.12.2025 at about 15.50 hours, while

the defacto complainant was going to Aanakkal for

collecting arecanut in a pickup vehicle, accused No.1

stopped the defacto complainant's vehicle from passing BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026

2026:KER:9350

and that was questioned by the defacto complainant. Due

to that enmity, accused Nos. 1 to 5 with the intention to

cause serious injuries to the defacto complainant, formed

themselves into an unlawful assembly knowing that they

were the members of the gang, accused No.1 intercepted

the vehicle of the defacto complainant at a place called

Kava in Malampuzha. Accused No.1 hit the defacto

complainant on the nose with a steel bangle thereby

caused serious injury and fracture to the nose and the

defacto complainant sustained injuries on his forehead and

behind his left ear. Accused Nos.2 to 5 grabbed the defacto

complainant from the vehicle and dragged him out and hit

him on various parts of his body with their hands, thereby

sustained injuries. Thus, the accused have committed the

above-mentioned offences.

4. I have heard Sri. Athul Krishna A and

Sarath M.S., the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.

M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the

case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026

2026:KER:9350

submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been

falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further

submitted that no materials are on record to connect the

applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled

to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other

hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part

of the applicants' intentional criminal acts, and if they are

released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the

investigation.

6. The law regarding the grant or refusal of

pre-arrest bail is well settled. Pre-arrest bail cannot be

granted as a matter of course. The power under Section

482 of BNSS could be exercised only when a special case is

made out, that too, recording reasons thereof. Perusal of

the case diary reveals that the accusation made against

the applicants is very serious in nature, and it prima facie

shows a premeditated criminal act on their part. Specific

avert acts have been alleged against the applicants. The

de facto complainant has sustained nasal bone fracture in

the incident.

BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026

2026:KER:9350

7. The investigation is in a preliminary

stage. The custodial interrogation of the applicants is

necessary for the investigation. As rightly argued by the

learned Senior Public Prosecutor, the possibility of the

applicants influencing the witnesses and interfering with

the investigation cannot be ruled out if they are released

on bail. Considering the gravity of the offence and stage of

the investigation, I am of the view that this is not a fit case

where the extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court

under Section 482 of BNSS could be invoked. The bail

applications are, accordingly, dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ARK BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026

2026:KER:9350

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 422 OF 2026

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF CRL MC 5410/2025 DATED 14.01.2026 IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS, PALAKKAD BAIL APPL. NOS. 422 & 421 OF 2026

2026:KER:9350

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 421 OF 2026

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF CRL MC 5410/2025 DATED 14.01.2026 IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS, PALAKKAD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter