Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akhil P.A vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 10483 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10483 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2025

Kerala High Court

Akhil P.A vs State Of Kerala on 4 November, 2025

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
W.P.(C) No.40941 of 2025




                                     1
                                                     2025:KER:83202

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

  TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 / 13TH KARTHIKA, 1947

                           WP(C) NO. 40941 OF 2025


PETITIONER(S):

             AKHIL P.A
             AGED 29 YEARS, S/O AYYAPPAN EZHUTHACHAN, PARAMEL
             HOUSE,PO THAYYUR, VELUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
             PIN - 680584

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR
             SMT.S.AGILA

RESPONDENT(S):

     1       STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
             SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

     2       DISTRICT COLLECTOR
             FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR
             DISTRICT, PIN - 680003

     3       REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
             FIRSTFLOOR, CIVILSTATION, CIVIL LINES ROAD,
             AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, KERALA, PIN - 680003

     4       THE TAHSILDAR(L.R)
             KUNNAMKULAM TALUK OFFICE MINI CIVIL STATION,
             THRISSUR, PIN - 680022

     5       VILLAGE OFFICER
             VILLAGE OFFICE, THAYYUR,VELUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
             THRISSUR, PIN - 680584

     6       AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
             VELUR KRISHI BHAVAN, VELUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT
             BUILDING, VELUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680601
 W.P.(C) No.40941 of 2025




                                     2
                                                            2025:KER:83202

     7       LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
             REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER/AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
             VELUR KRISHI BHAVAN, VELUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT
             BUILDING, VELUR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680601


BY ADV.:

             SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE


         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   04.11.2025,      THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY    DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.40941 of 2025




                                   3
                                                      2025:KER:83202


                       P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                ---------------------------------------------
                     W.P.(C) No.40941 of 2025
            ------------------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 04th day of November, 2025


                             JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following

reliefs:

"i. To Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction Quashing Ext P4 rejection order dated 5/8/2024 passed by the 3rd respondent in respect of the petitioner's Form 5 application under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008;

ii. To Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to reconsider and pass fresh orders on the petitioner's Form 5 application in accordance with law and within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court; iii. Grant such other relief as this Hon'ble Court may consider just and proper in the interest of justice, including costs.

And iv. To dispense with English translation of the Malayalam documents" [SIC]

2025:KER:83202

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order

passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting Ext.P2 Form-5

application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala

Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008

('Rules', for brevity). The main grievance of the

petitioner is that the authorised officer has not

considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader.

4. This Court perused the impugned order. I am

of the considered opinion that the authorised officer has

failed to comply with the statutory requirements. The

impugned order was passed by the authorised officer

solely based on the report of the Agricultural Officer.

There is no indication in the order that the authorised

officer has directly inspected the property or called for

the satellite pictures as mandated under Rule 4(4f) of the

Rules. There is no independent finding regarding the

nature and character of the land as on the relevant date

2025:KER:83202

by the authorised officer. Moreover, the authorised

officer has not considered whether the exclusion of the

property would prejudicially affect the surrounding paddy

fields.

5. This Court in Muraleedharan Nair R v.

Revenue Divisional Officer [2023 (4) KHC 524],

Sudheesh U v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Palakkad [2023 (2) KLT 386], and Joy K.K. v. The

Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector,

Ernakulam [2021 (1) KLT 433], observed that the

competent authority is obliged to assess the nature, lie

and character of the land and its suitability for paddy

cultivation as on 12.08.2008, which are the decisive

criteria to determine whether the property merits

exclusion from the data bank. The impugned order is not

in accordance with the principle laid down by this Court

in the above judgments. Therefore, I am of the

considered opinion that the impugned order is to be set

aside.

2025:KER:83202

Therefore, this Writ Petition(C) is allowed in the

following manner:

1. Ext.P4 order is set aside.

2. The 3rd respondent / authorised officer is

directed to reconsider Ext.P2 Form - 5

application submitted by the petitioner, in

accordance with the law. The authorised officer

shall either conduct a personal inspection of

the property or, alternatively, call for the

satellite pictures, in accordance with Rule 4(4f)

of the Rules, at the cost of the petitioner, if not

already called for.

3. If satellite pictures are called for, the

application shall be disposed of within three

months from the date of receipt of such

pictures. On the other hand, if the authorised

officer opts to personally inspect the property,

the application shall be considered and

disposed of within two months from the date of

2025:KER:83202

production of a copy of this judgment by the

petitioner.

Sd/-


                                            P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,
                                                   JUDGE
nvj

Judgment reserved             NA
Date of Judgment           04.11.2025
Judgment dictated          04.11.2025
Draft Judgment placed      04.11.2025
Final Judgment uploaded    05.11.2025






                                                   2025:KER:83202


                    APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40941/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit - P1               TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT NO.

KL08072602092/2025 DATED 3/7/2025 IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER ,ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit - P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION PREFERRED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 21/3/ 2023 Exhibit - P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO :KL08072600279/2013 EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT OF EXT P2 DATED 21/3/2023 Exhibit - P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER BEARING FILE NO 9055/2024, PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.AND DATED 5/8/2024 Exhibit - P 5 ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPHS EVIDENCING THE NATURE OF THE LAND

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter