Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sgs Agro Farms Ltd vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 11753 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11753 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2025

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sgs Agro Farms Ltd vs State Of Kerala on 10 December, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025               1                  2025:KER:95087

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA,

                                     1947

                          CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025

      CRIME NO.91/2020 OF Town West Police Station, Thrissur

          AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.68 OF 2020 OF

SPECIAL COURT OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR

FOR   THE    TRIAL   OF    CASES   UNDER    THE   PRIZE   CHITS   AND   MONEY

CIRCULATION SCHEME (BANNING) ACT, 1978

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 7:

      1       SGS AGRO FARMS LTD,
              REPRESENTED ITS CHAIRMAN, S.G.SEKAR, 59,1STFLOOR,
              2ND STREET,SECRETARIAT COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN
              - 600010

      2       S.G.SEKAR,
              AGED 65 YEARS
              S/O.P.SUBBUNADAR, 4, SECOND CROSS STREET, SYLVAN
              LODGE COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

      3       G.SATISHDAS,
              AGED 40 YEARS
              S/O.S.G.SEKAR,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
              COLONYKELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

      4       G.SHANTHI,
              AGED 59 YEARS
              W/O.S.G.SEKAR,4,SECOND CROSS STREET, SYLVAN LODGE
              COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

      5       G.SANDEEP DAS,
              AGED 34 YEARS
              S/O.S.G.SEKAR,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
              COLONY,KELLEYS,CHENNAI, PIN - 600010
 CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025           2          2025:KER:95087


    6     S.FAUSTINA,
          AGED 35 YEARS
          W/O.G.SATISHDAS,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
          COLONY,KELLEYS,CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    7     RAJAKUMAR GANASEKAR,
          AGED 38 YEARS
          S/O.GANASEKAR,1-3,GROUND FLOOR, BHARATH FLATS,R.V.
          NAGAR EAST,NEAR J.JAYALALITHA BASKET BALL INDOOR
          STADIUM,ANNA NAGAR EAST, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN -
          600012

    8     ROBIN VIJAYKUMAR,
          AGED 36 YEARS
          S/O.GANGA SUNDARAM,294,PURASAWAKKAM,HIGH ROAD,
          KELLEYSCHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN - 600010


          BY ADVS.
          SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
          SRI.M.H.ASIF ALI
          SHRI.ARAVIND T RAMESH
          SHRI.ASHIK ALI M.H.
          SMT.ASWATHI K.C.




RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

    1     STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2     O.T.KAMARUNNISA,
          AGED 71YEARS,W/O.SIDHIQ,PONNAM CHATHAYIL HOUSE,
          PILLAKKAD,POOKODE VILLAGE,KOTTAPPADI,THRISSUR, PIN -
          680505


          BY ADV SHRI.ITTY PAULSON

          SR.PP.SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025          3              2025:KER:95087

                           C.S.DIAS, J.
               ---------------------------------------
                 CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025
       ------------------------------------------------------
      Dated this the 10th day of December, 2025

                             ORDER

The petitioners are the accused Nos 1 to 8 in

C.C.No.68/2020 on the file of the Special Court of the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, for the

trial of cases under the Prize Chits and Money

Circulation Scheme (Banning), Act, 1978, (Trial Court),

which has arisen from Crime No.91/2020 registered by

the Town West Police Station, Thrissur, alleging the

commission of the offence punishable under Section

420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 2(c) of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation

Schemes (Banning), Act, 1978.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash all CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025 4 2025:KER:95087

further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted

that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime

has been amicably settled between the petitioners and

the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2

affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the

learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that,

with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the

parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 2nd

respondent has no subsisting grievance and does not

wish to pursue the prosecution, and has no objection to

the proceedings being quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that the Investigating Officer has not recorded

the statement of the 2nd respondent. However, the

State has no objection to the Criminal Miscellaneous CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025 5 2025:KER:95087

case being allowed.

6. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of

this Court to quash criminal proceedings on the ground

of settlement between the parties have been

authoritatively laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in

Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303],

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and

Others [(2019) 5 SCC 688], Naushey Ali v. State of

U.P. [(2025) 4 SCC 78], and in a host of judicial

pronouncements. It is held that in cases where the

offences are not grave or heinous, and where the

parties have amicably settled the dispute, to secure the

ends of justice, the High Court may invoke its inherent

powers to quash the proceedings, particularly if

continuation of the prosecution would serve no fruitful

purpose.

7. On an overall consideration of the facts and

circumstances of the present case, and the materials on CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025 6 2025:KER:95087

record, I am satisfied that: the offences alleged are not

heinous or of a serious nature; no public interest or

element of societal concern is involved; the chances of

conviction are remote in view of the settlement; and

the continuation of the proceedings would merely

burden the judicial process without advancing the

cause of justice. Furthermore, the settlement would

promote harmony between the parties and restore

peace. Hence, this Court is persuaded to hold that this

is a fit case to exercise its inherent jurisdiction.

In the result, the Crl. M.C. is allowed. Accordingly,

Annexure A1 Final Report in Crime No.91/2020 of the

Town West Police Station, Thrissur and all further

proceedings in C.C.No.68/2020 on the file of the Trial

Court, as against the petitioners, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE

SCB/10.12.25.

CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025 7 2025:KER:95087

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 10840 OF 2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.91/2020 OF THRISSUR TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR Annexure A2 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DT.08.10.2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter