Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

U.Fassaludeen vs Smt.Niveditha P.Haran
2024 Latest Caselaw 26786 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26786 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

U.Fassaludeen vs Smt.Niveditha P.Haran on 5 September, 2024

Author: Murali Purushothaman

Bench: Murali Purushothaman

                                                                  2024:KER:67444

                                        1
CON.CASE(C) NO. 876 OF 2010


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

    THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 14TH BHADRA, 1946

                        CON.CASE(C) NO. 876 OF 2010

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WPC NO.19076 OF 2008 OF

HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER/S:

             U.FASSALUDEEN
             52 YEARS, DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY,, KOLLAM
             NOW WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, AMBALAPUZHA TALUK, OFFICE,
             ALAPPUZHA.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.K.JAJU BABU
             SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI


RESPONDENTS:

    1        SMT.NIVEDITHA P.HARAN
             FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,, PRINCIPAL
             SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE, DEPARTMENT,
             GOVT.SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.

    2        SRI.K.R.MURALEEDHARAN IAS
             AGED AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
             COMMISSIONER OF LAND REVENUE ,TRIVANDRUM.

             BY SR.G.P. SRI. V.K.SUNIL



     THIS    CONTEMPT   OF   COURT    CASE     (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                      2024:KER:67444

                                 2
CON.CASE(C) NO. 876 OF 2010




                              JUDGMENT

This contempt of court case is of the year 2010.

By efflux of time, nothing survives to be considered in

this contempt of court case and accordingly, it is closed

with liberty to the petitioner to move for re-hearing, if

required.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN

JUDGE al/-.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter