Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33340 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
Friday, the 15th day of November 2024 / 24th Karthika, 1946
RSA NO. 602 OF 2024(FILING NO.)
JUDGMENT DATED 02.06.2015 IN AS 16/2024 OF ASSITANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB
COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT, MANJERI
JUDGMENT DATED 10.06.2010 IN OS 222/1997 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN AS/DEFENDANTS IN OS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM,
PIN - 676565.
2. THE ERNAD TALUK TAHSILDAR, MANJERI, MANJERI AMSOM, DESOM, ERNAD
TALUK, PIN - 676517.
3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NARUKARA VILLAGE, NARUKARA, NARUKARA
AMSOM/DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN - 676122.
4. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER, MANJERI, MANJERI AMSOM, DESOM,
ERNAD TALUK, PIN - 676121.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT IN AS/PLAINTIFF IN OS:
ILLIYAS, S/O KINATTINGAL SAITHALI, AGED 74 YEARS, KARUVAMBRAM AMSOM,
MELAKKAM DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, PIN - 676123.
This Unnumbered Regular Second Appeal(filing no.602/2024) having
come up for orders on 15.11.2024, the court on the same day passed the
following:
(p.t.o)
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J.
=====================
UNNUMBERED RSA ----- OF 2024
(FILING No. 602 OF 2024)
===================
Dated this the 15th day of November, 2024
=============================
ORDER
1. This R.S.A is not numbered on account of certain defects in
the I.A filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil
Procedure to accept the same as additional evidence. The
appellant has produced certain documents along with said
I.A without marking the same.
2. The Registry noted the defects that only if the documents
produced along with the said I.A are marked and correctly
entered in the Metadata in the Annexure filed, the same will
be reflected in the Appendix of the judgment in the event of
disposal of the case; and that the documents are neither
original nor certified copies.
3. The learned Government Pleader submitted that certified
copies of the very same documents are produced in RSA UNNUMBERED RSA ----- OF 2024 (FILING No. 602 OF 2024)
No.593/2017 arising from the very same common judgment
and decree of the Trial Court challenged in the present
appeal and both the appeals are to be heard together. Hence
there is no necessity to produce original/certified copies in
both the appeals.
4. I find that if the original/certified copies of the very same
documents are produced in the connected RSA
No.593/2017, the production of copies of the same is
sufficient in this appeal as both the appeals would be
considered together.
5. But the appellant has to mark each of the documents in the
I.A filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil
Procedure as Annexures. Those documents are to be
included in the Appendix of the judgment only if this Court
allows the I.A filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of
Civil Procedure. In such case, the marking of the documents
will be in continuation of the documents already marked by
the Trial Court and the Appellate Court as Exhibits. If the I.A UNNUMBERED RSA ----- OF 2024 (FILING No. 602 OF 2024)
filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure
is not allowed, the said documents will not form part of the
Appeal and it will remain as the Annexures to the I.A filed
under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure
6. Hence, I direct the appellant to produce the documents along
with the I.A filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil
Procedure marking each of the documents as Annexures to
the said Application with an affirmation that original/certified
copies of the same are already produced in RSA
No.593/2017. On filing such Application the Registry is
directed to number the Application.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE sms
15-11-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!