Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17395 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 31ST JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 18212 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
DR. NEEMA C.P, W/O. RAJEEV P,AGED 48 YEARS
ROHINI, NEAR RAILWAY CUTTING, PANNERI MUKKU,
VALAPATTANAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670010
BY ADVS.
NISHA GEORGE
REGINALD VALSALAN
SIDHARTH.R.WARIYAR
GEORGE POONTHOTTAM (SR.)
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITY ROAD, SOUTH KALAMASSERY, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - - 682022
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
2 THE VICE CHANCELLOR
THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,
UNIVERSITY ROAD, SOUTH KALAMASSERY, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, 682022
3 THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE ROAD, NEAR EXCISE OFFICE,
EAST FORT, PAZHAVANGADI,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695023
4 LAKSHMI P.R.
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR (ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE)
FACULTY OF MARINE SCIENCE, THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, UNIVERSITY ROAD,
SOUTH KALAMASSERY, KALAMASSERY, KOCHI,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682022
BY ADVS.
SHRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY, SC, COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LAKSHMI RAMADAS
M.R.SABU(000K/521/1989)
APARNA RAJAN(K/851/2009)
SREEDHAR RAVINDRAN(K/559/2012)
SRI. P RAVINDRAN (SR.) FOR R4. ,
SRI VENUGOPAL V (GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 18212 OF 2023 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a person belonging to the ' Thiyya' community
and is included among the 'Other Backward Class' (hereinafter
referred to as 'the OBC') category. According to the petitioner,
the petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Professor -
(Meteorology) in the Department of Atmospheric Science in the
1st respondent-University. The said post was reserved for
members of the OBC community. According to the petitioner,
the petitioner and 4th respondent were ranked as 2 nd and 1st
respectively in the rank list prepared by the University for
appointment to the abovesaid post. The singular challenge
made by the petitioner to the appointment of the 4th
respondent is that the 4th respondent was not entitled to the
benefit of OBC reservation as she was not entitled to a Non-
Creamy Layer Certificate. It is alleged that, both the parents of
the 4th respondent were employed in Class I posts and
therefore, going by the relevant Government orders regarding
issuance of Non-Creamy Layer Certificate, the 4th respondent
was not entitled to a Non-Creamy Layer Certificate. In other
words, it is the case of the petitioner that, if the 4 th respondent
was thus not entitled to the benefit of OBC reservation, the
petitioner, being next in the rank list, should have been
appointed in preference to the 4th respondent.
2. The 4th respondent has filed a counter affidavit. The
specific contention taken in the counter affidavit is that though
the parents of the 4th respondent might have retired from Class
I posts, for the purposes of considering whether the 4 th
respondent is entitled to a Non-Creamy Layer Certificate, the
consideration must be the post to which they were originally
appointed. It is submitted with reference to Ext.R4(e)
document (O.M. No.36012/22/93Estt.(SCT) dated 08.09.1993)
that the 4th respondent will lose the benefit of reservation only
if either of her parents had been appointed to a Class I post or
Class-II post by 'Direct Recruitment'. It is submitted with
reference to Exts.R4(b) and R4(c) that the father of the 4 th
respondent had been originally appointed on 13.08.1984 as
Assistant Grade-I in the Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing
and Marketing) Corporation Limited and that the mother of the
4th respondent had been appointed as Junior Lecturer in
Sanskrit (General), Department of Collegiate Education on
16.03.1984. It is submitted that, both these posts are not Class
I or even Class II posts and therefore, the 4 th respondent is
entitled to a Non-Creamy Layer Certificate as contemplated by
the provisions of Ext.R4(e).
3. A reply affidavit was filed by the petitioner raising
doubts regarding the genuineness of Exts.R4(b), R4(c) and
R4(d) documents. It was pointed out that both in Exts. R4(b)
and R4(c) documents, the posts to which the person concerned
was appointed appears to have been manipulated.
4. When the matter is taken up for consideration today,
Adv. P. Ravindran, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for
the 4th respondent, on the instructions of Adv. Lakshmi Ramdas,
has placed for my consideration the originals of Exts. R4(b),
R4(c) and R4(d). I have perused the originals of Exts. R4(b),
R4(c) and R4(d) and I am convinced that there is absolutely no
manipulation and photocopies of Exts. R4(b), R4(c) and R4(d)
produced along with the counter affidavit of the 4 th respondent
are exact copies of the originals. The question as to whether
the 4th respondent will lose benefits of reservation in the OBC
Category if any of her parents are retired from a Class-I Post is
no longer res integra . It is settled by the judgment of this
Court in Abdul Gafoor C.H. and Another V. State of Kerala
and Others [2024 SCC OnLine Ker 477], that a son or
daughter of a Government employee, who retires from a Class I
Post or Class II post will lose benefit of OBC reservation only if
the parents or either of them had been originally appointed to
Class I post or Class II post by Direct Recruitment. This is not
the case here. The parents of the 4 th respondent were not
appointed directly to the post from which they retired. I am in
respectful agreement with the view taken by this Court in
Abdul Gafoor (supra). Further this is also clear from
Ext.R4(e) Office Memorandum issued by the Government of
India in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and
Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training), as also from
Ext.R4(g) order issued by the Government of Kerala in the
SC/ST Development Department. Therefore, the petitioner is
not entitled to any of the reliefs sought for in the writ petition.
The writ petition fails and it is accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18212/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NON-CREAMY LAYER CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT ON 30.01.2016 ALONG WITH ITS TYPED LEGIBLE COPY Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST FOR THE POST OF ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, METEOROLOGY ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.09.2022 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P(C) NO.24902 OF
Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS DATED 17.01.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR Exhibit-P4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS DATED 17.01.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR.
Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.A 5- 35817/2022 DATED 06.02.2023 SENT BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TAHSILDAR TO THE PETITIONER. Exhibit-P5(a) TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BEARING G.O.MS. NO. 66/90/HEDN DATED 13.03.1990 Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.27396/F3/07/SCSTDD DATED 14.06.2010 ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER BEARING GO.
(MS) NO. 05/2014/BCDD DATED 31.01.2014 Exhibit-P8 True copy of the Notification No.F.1-21/87 U.I dated 17.6.1987 issued by the University Grant Commission Exhibit-P9 True typed copy of the notification dated 27.11.1990 in D.O.No.F.1-6/90(PS cell) issued by the University Grants Commission RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit-R4(a) True copy of the order issued by the Cochin University of Science and Technology Appointing the 4th respondent to the post of Assistant Professor, Meteorology Department No.Ad.D1/AP/LPR/Atm. Sc./2016 Dated 23.03.2016 Exhibit-R4(b) True copy of the order issued by the Managing
Director, BEVCO relieving 4th respondent's father Sri.Ravi Sankar P.V. on superannuation dated 18.11.2015 No.AE1/890/2012/KSBC Exhibit-R4(c) True copy of the order issued by the Director of Collegiate Education appoint the 4th respondent's Mother, Smt.T.G.Shylaja as Junior Lecturer in Sanskrit In the Government Brennen College, Thalassery No.Estt.F3/37559/81/Coll.Edn. Dated 16.03.1984 Exhibit-R4(d) Typed copy of the proceedings of the Additional Director of Collegiate Education dated nil of November, 1992 No. 84914/91 Exhibit-R4(e) True copy of the office memorandum issued by the Government of India dated 08.09.1993 No.36012/22/93- Estt. (sct).
Exhibit-R4(f) True copy of the relevant pages of the communication issued by the Department of Personnel and Training O.M.No.36033/ 5/2004- Estt.(SCT), dated 14.10.2004 to the Chief Secretaries of all the States/Union Territories Exhibit-R4(g) True copy of the order issued by the Government of Kerala No.G.O.(P) No.81/09/SCSTDD dated 26.09.2009 Exhibit-R4(h) True copy of the order issued by the Government of Kerala No.G.O.(MS) No.95/2009/SCSTDD Dated 10.11.2009 Exhibit-R4(i) True copy of the proceedings of the Additional Director of Collegiate Education, Thiruvananthapuram bearing No.F3.28931/84/L.Dis. Dated 19.06.1984 Exhibit-R4(j) The order issued by the Managing Director, Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd. Bearing No. AE1/14608/07 DATED 12.12.2007
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!