Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16214 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2024
W. A. No. 438 of 2024
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.J.DESAI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 20TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WA NO. 438 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.921 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
APPELLANT/S:
MRS. PADMAJA NAIR
AGED 77 YEARS
T.C. 9/399, SOORYA GARDENS SASTHAMANGALAM
TRIVANDRUM - 695 010, PIN - 695010
BY ADV M.R.JAYAPRASAD
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
POLICE GROUND, C.V. RAMAN PILLAI RD, THYCAUD,
TIRUVANTHAPURAM - 695 014, PIN - 695014
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER
SASTHAMANGALAM, PEROORKADA ROAD DEVAPALAN NAGAR,
THIRUVANATHAPURM -695013, PIN - 695013
3 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KERALA
STATE POLICE HEADQUARTERS,
VELLAYAMBALAM,THIRUVANTHAPURAM - 695010, PIN -
695012
4 AJITH KUMAR K
E-10 , CHITTADETH HOUSE INDIAN EXPRESS LANE
SASTHAMANGALM TRIVANDRUM -695010, PIN - 695010
5 KRISHNARAJ RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI (SOUGHT TO BE
IMPLEADED )
KRISHNARAJ RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 46 YEARS,
S/O. LATE RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI R. HOUSE NO.15.
W. A. No. 438 of 2024
-2-
SECRETARY, SOORYA GARDENS RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION,
SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010, PIN -
695010
BY ADVS.
R.V. SREEJITH
G.MAHESWARY(K/1688/2001)
T.RINI(K/1194/2000)
HARIGOVIND S.NAIR(K/933/2022)
NIDHIN KRISHNA(K/1164/2004)
ANAKHA BABU(K/324/2023)
SWETHA JOSCO(K/002169/2024)
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.GP.K.P.HARISH
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W. A. No. 438 of 2024
-3-
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 10th day of June, 2024
A. J. Desai, C. J.
By way of the present appeal filed under Section 5 of the
Kerala High Court Act, 1958, the original petitioner has
challenged the judgment dated 05.07.2023 in W. P. (C) No. 921 of
2023 by which the learned Single Judge has disposed of the writ
petition as under:-
"If there is any threat to the life of the petitioner or the 4th respondent, both of them are free to approach the 2 nd respondent with appropriate petition and if such a petition is received, the 2nd respondent will do the needful to see that there is no threat to the life of the petitioner and the 4 th respondent.
2. We are in complete agreement with the observations made
by the learned Single Judge in paragraphs 5 and 6 and further
directing the petitioner or the 4th respondent to approach the 2nd
respondent with appropriate petition, if there is threat to their
lives.
The writ appeal is dismissed accordingly.
Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/-
A. J. DESAI CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
V. G. ARUN JUDGE
Eb
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 30.12.2023 TO THE PETITIONER FROM POLICE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!