Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hijas vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 15011 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15011 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 June, 2024

Kerala High Court

Hijas vs State Of Kerala on 4 June, 2024

Author: K. Babu

Bench: K. Babu

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
           Tuesday, the 4th day of June 2024 / 14th Jyaishta, 1946
                  CRL.M.A 1/2022 IN CRL.A NO. 1266 OF 2022
SC 552/2020 OF SPECIAL COURT (ATROCITIES AGAINST SC/ST), MANJERI, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO 1:

     HIJAS AGED 24 YEARS S/O.ABDUL RASAK, VETTILAKATH HOUSE, MANKAVU
     P.O., KOZHIKODE CUSBA, KOZHIKODE , PIN - 673007

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/STATE:

     STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
     KERALA-682031 (CRIME NO.426/2020 OF KONDOTTY POLICE STATION)


     Application praying that the circumstances stated therein the
Highcourt be pleased to suspend the execution of sentence passed in SC No.
552/2020,by the Special Court For SC/ST(POA)Act & NDPS Act
Cases,Manjeri,till the disposal of the Criminal Appeal filed by the
appellant.

     This Criminal appeal coming on for orders,upon perusing the
application       and     upon     hearing      the     arguments    of
ADVS.S.RAJEEV,V.VINAY,M.S.ANEER,PRERITH          PHILIP   JOSEPH,SARATH
K.P.,ANILKUMAR C.R. Advocates for the petitioner and PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
for the respondent,the court passed the following:
                              K.BABU, J.
          ---------------------------------------------------
          Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.1197 of 2022
                                  &
          Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.1266 of 2022
          ---------------------------------------------------
                        Dated 4th June, 2024


                               ORDER

These are applications seeking suspension of sentence.

2. The petitioners/appellants are the accused in

S.C.No.550/2020 on the file of the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act &

NDPS Act cases, Manjeri. The appellant in Crl.A.No.1266 of 2022 is

accused No.1 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.1197 of 2022 is accused

No.2. They have been convicted for the offences punishable under

Sections 22(b), 22(c) and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a

period of 10 years each and pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each.

The prosecution case

3. On 5.6.2020 at 8 p.m. at Neettanimmal, within the limits

of Kondotty Municipality, the accused were found travelling on a motor

cycle bearing registration No.KL 11 BE 4729, accused No.1 possessing

0.190 grams of LSD stamps and accused No.2 possessing 3.740 grams

of methamphetamine, having conspired together for sale. Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.1197 of 2022 & Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.1266 of 2022

4. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the

judgment of conviction is not sustainable and that there is every chance

that the appeals will be allowed in favour of the appellants on the

ground that the prosecution failed to establish that the contraband

substance allegedly seized from the place of occurrence eventually

reached the forensic science laboratory. The learned counsel submitted

that though the arrest and seizure were effected on 5.6.2020 the

properties were produced before the Court only on 8.6.2020. It is

further submitted that the delay in the production of the properties,

including the sample, has not been satisfactorily explained by the

prosecution. The learned counsel has taken me to the deposition of

PW1 in support of his contention.

5. The petitioners/appellants have been in custody since

5.6.2020. Having regard to the nature of challenge raised by the

appellants and the further fact that they had undergone imprisonment

for a period of four years, I am of the view that the sentence imposed

on the appellants can be suspended on conditions. Accordingly, the

execution of the sentence imposed on the petitioners/appellants shall

stand suspended and bail granted to them on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioners/appellants shall execute bond for Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs only) each with two Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.1197 of 2022 & Crl.M.A.No.1 of 2022 in Crl.A.No.1266 of 2022

solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

(ii) The petitioners/appellants shall also deposit Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees fifty thousand only) each being half of the fine amount in the trial Court within a period of three months from today.

(iii) The petitioners/appellants shall appear before the Investigating Officer, on the first and last Saturdays of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m.

(iv) The petitioners/appellants shall not involve in any other offence while on bail.

Sd/-

K.BABU Judge

TKS

04-06-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter