Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10213 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 24TH BHADRA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1372 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5085/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
BEEFATHUMMA
AGED 66 YEARS
D/O LATE SAINUL ABID, PUTHIYATHAKAL,DARUL BARKAT,
KILTAN ISLAND,U.T OF LAKSHADWEEP
PIN -682555, PIN - 682555
BY ADVS.
ANZIL SALIM
LAL K.JOSEPH
P.MURALEEDHARAN (THURAVOOR)
T.A.LUXY
SURESH SUKUMAR
KOYA ARAFA MIRAGE
SANJAY SELLEN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5:
1 ASKER ALI
DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR,
KAVARATTI ISLAND,
U.T OF LAKSHADWEEP
PIN-682555, PIN - 682555
2 C.N. SHAJAHAN
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,
LAKSHADWEEP PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT(LPWD),KAVARATTI ISLAND,U.T
OF LAKSHDWEEP-682555, PIN - 682555
3 A.P. SHARAFFUDDIN
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
LAKSHADWEEP PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT(LPWD),KAVARATTI ISLAND,
U.T OF LAKSHADWEEP - 682555, PIN - 682555
4 MOHAMMED KOYA
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
LAKSHADWEEP PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT(LPWD), SUB-DIVISION,KILTAN
ISLAND,
U.T OF LAKSHADWEEP -682558, PIN - 682558
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1372 OF 2022
2
BY ADVS.
SAJITH KUMAR V.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1372 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case has been filed on the allegation that in spite
of the directions of this Court, no action has been taken by the
respondent for acquisition of the property of the petitioner.
2. However, when this matter was called today, Sri.V.Sajith
Kumar - learned counsel appearing for the respondent, submitted that
a notification under Section 4(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation
and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013, has been issued and that the acquisition will
be completed not later than six months from today, in compliance with
the procedure under the said Act. He added that, an application has
also been filed in the writ petition for extension of time.
Recording the afore submissions, I close this Contempt Case;
however, leaving full liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court
for a re-hearing of this matter, in case, consequent action to the
notification stated to have been issued is not completed within a
period of seven months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
SD/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp CON.CASE(C) NO. 1372 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1372/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 10.09.2021 IN WP(C) NO. 5085/2018
ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.11.2021 SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN (2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION)
ANNEXURE A2(A) TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DATED 17.11.2021 EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE A2
ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.11.2021 SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT HEREIN (3RD RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION)
ANNEXURE A3(A) THE TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD DATED 16.11.2021 EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE A3
RESPONDENT ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE R1(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER F.NO.106/27/2020-
S3(1)/613 DATED 29.03.2022 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE 2ND PETITIONER HEREIN
ANNEXURE R1(B) A TRUE COPY OF NOTIFICATION F.NO.34/17/2019-LR DATED 22.08.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER HEREIN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!